Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32784828›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Evaluation of Nuclear Cataract with Smartphone-Attachable Slit-Lamp Device.

Hiroyuki Yazu, Eisuke Shimizu, Sho Okuyama, Takuya Katahira, Naohiko Aketa, Ryota Yokoiwa, Yasunori Sato, Yoko Ogawa, Hiroshi Fujishima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of a new portable corneal topography system for self-measurement using smartphones: a pilot study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of the AI Pipeline for Corneal Opacity Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Mobile infrared slit-light scanner for rapid eye disease screening.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hiroyuki YazuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa 230-0063, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7371-6558
Eisuke ShimizuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3422-8578
Sho OkuyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa 230-0063, Japan.
Takuya KatahiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa 230-0063, Japan.
Naohiko AketaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0188-1255
Ryota YokoiwaOUI Inc., Tokyo 160-0022, Japan.
Yasunori SatoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Biostatistics at Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan.
Yoko OgawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan.
Hiroshi FujishimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa 230-0063, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cataractconventional slit-lamp microscopeportablerecordablesmart eye camera

Identifiers

PMID32784828
PMCPMC7459829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.