Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32784780›Full record

ArticleInsects2020

Genetic Variation in the Feeding Behavior of Isofemale Lines of

Milena Chinchilla-Ramírez, Meritxell Pérez-Hedo, Bart A Pannebakker, Alberto Urbaneja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Floral Resource Integration: Enhancing Biocontrol ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Dual Benefit of Plant Essential Oils againstPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Milena Chinchilla-RamírezUnidad de Entomología UJI-IVIA, Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), CV-315, Km. 10,7, 46113 Moncada (Valencia), Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1680-9862
Meritxell Pérez-HedoUnidad de Entomología UJI-IVIA, Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), CV-315, Km. 10,7, 46113 Moncada (Valencia), Spain.
Bart A PannebakkerWageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Genetics, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8503-3896
Alberto UrbanejaUnidad de Entomología UJI-IVIA, Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), CV-315, Km. 10,7, 46113 Moncada (Valencia), Spain.
Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias · ESWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 641456Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria Subprogram DOC-INIA-CCAAMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad RTA2017-00073-00-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoophytophagous predators provide biocontrol services in various major crops of modern horticulture due to the combination of its predatory capacity and the induction of plant defenses derived from its phytophagy. However, under certain conditions of prey scarcity, these natural enemies can inflict plant damage. Exploitation of genetic variation and subsequent selective breeding on foraging traits is a potential alternative to overcome this inconvenience. In this study, we quantified the genetic variation of phytophagy and zoophagy of

Indexed as

biological controlMiridaephytophagytomatozoophagyzoophytophagous predator

Identifiers

PMID32784780
PMCPMC7469200
OpenAlexW3048118557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.