ReviewCancers2020
Electroporation-Based Treatments in Urology.
Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical and Chemical Methods for DNA Vaccine Delivery: Insights into the Melanoma Landscape.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Compound steep-pulse irreversible electroporation for prostate ablation in Beagle dogs: parameter evaluation and short-term safety.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Nanosecond pulsed electric fields induce cell-size-dependent selective permeabilization of urothelial cancer cells.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Reversible electroporation for cancer therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Current Status of Cryoablation in Prostate Cancer Management.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025Review
- Pulsed electric field induces exocytosis and overexpression of MAGE antigens in melanoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Drug Resistance and Novel Therapies in Cancers in 2020.Cancers · 2023Article
- Boosting the Immune Response-Combining Local and Immune Therapy for Prostate Cancer Treatment.Cells · 2022Review
- Atorvastatin Modulates the Efficacy of Electroporation and Calcium Electrochemotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Review
- Oxidative Effects during Irreversible Electroporation of Melanoma Cells-In Vitro Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Electrochemotherapy with Calcium Chloride and 17β-Estradiol Modulated Viability and Apoptosis Pathway in Human Ovarian Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- In Vitro Study of Calcium Microsecond Electroporation of Prostate Adenocarcinoma Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Assessment of Hepatic Lesions After non-Thermal Tumor Ablation by Irreversible Electroporation in a Pig Model.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The observation that an application of a pulsed electric field (PEF) resulted in an increased permeability of the cell membrane has led to the discovery of the phenomenon called electroporation (EP). Depending on the parameters of the electric current and cell features, electroporation can be either reversible or irreversible. The irreversible electroporation (IRE) found its use in urology as a non-thermal ablative method of prostate and renal cancer. As its mechanism is based on the permeabilization of cell membrane phospholipids, IRE (as well as other treatments based on EP) provides selectivity sparing extracellular proteins and matrix. Reversible EP enables the transfer of genes, drugs, and small exogenous proteins. In clinical practice, reversible EP can locally increase the uptake of cytotoxic drugs such as cisplatin and bleomycin. This approach is known as electrochemotherapy (ECT). Few in vivo and in vitro trials of ECT have been performed on urological cancers. EP provides the possibility of transmission of genes across the cell membrane. As the protocols of gene electrotransfer (GET) over the last few years have improved, EP has become a well-known technique for non-viral cell transfection. GET involves DNA transfection directly to the cancer or the host skin and muscle tissue. Among urological cancers, the GET of several plasmids encoding prostate cancer antigens has been investigated in clinical trials. This review brings into discussion the underlying mechanism of EP and an overview of the latest progress and development perspectives of EP-based treatments in urology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.