Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32784480›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Cystic Fibrosis-Screening Positive Inconclusive Diagnosis: Newborn Screening and Long-Term Follow-Up Permits to Early Identify Patients with CFTR-Related Disorders.

Alice Castaldo, Chiara Cimbalo, Raimondo J Castaldo, Marcella D'Antonio, Manuela Scorza, Laura Salvadori, Angela Sepe, Valeria Raia, Antonella Tosco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alice CastaldoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Chiara CimbaloDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Raimondo J CastaldoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Marcella D'AntonioCEINGE-Advanced Biotechnology, Via Gaetano Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy.
Manuela ScorzaCEINGE-Advanced Biotechnology, Via Gaetano Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy.
Laura SalvadoriDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Angela SepeDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Valeria RaiaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonella ToscoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · ITCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewborn screening (NBS) early-identifies cystic fibrosis (CF), but in CF-screening positive inconclusive diagnosis (CF-SPID) the results of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT), molecular analysis and sweat test (ST) are discordant. A percentage of CF-SPID evolves to CF, but data on long-term monitoring are lacking. We describe the follow-up of all CF and CF-SPID identified between 2008 and 2019.

methodsNBS was performed by IRT followed by molecular analysis and ST between 2008 and 2014; double IRT followed by molecular analysis and ST after 2014.

resultsNBS revealed 47 CF and 99 CF-SPID newborn, a ratio 1:2.1-the highest reported so far. This depends on the identification by gene sequencing of the second variant with undefined effect in 40 CF-SPID that otherwise would have been defined as carriers. Clinical complications and pulmonary infections occurred more frequently among CF patients than among CF-SPID. Two CF-SPID cases evolved to CF (at two years), while eight evolved to CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RD), between one and eight years, with bronchiectasis (two), recurrent pneumonia (four, two with sinonasal complications), recurrent pancreatitis (two). No clinical, biochemical or imaging data predicted the evolution.

conclusionGene sequencing within the NBS reveals a higher number of CF-SPID and we first describe an approach to early identify CFTR-RD, with relevant impact on their outcome.

Indexed as

CF-SPIDCFTR-RDcystic fibrosisgenotype–phenotype correlationnewborn screening

Identifiers

PMID32784480
PMCPMC7460402
OpenAlexW3047912782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.