Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32784263›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

'Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk with Motivational Interviewing' (PIVOT with MI) trial: a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a clinician vaccine communication intervention.

Douglas J Opel, Jeffrey D Robinson, Heather Spielvogle, Christine Spina, Kathleen Garrett, Amanda F Dempsey, Cathryn Perreira, Miriam Dickinson, Chuan Zhou, Barbara Pahud and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03885232 nacompletednot on this map

Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk With Motivational Interviewing (PIVOT With MI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2019 to 2024Enrolled17,446ConditionsPreventive Health Services (PREV HEALTH SERV)ArmsExperimental: PIVOT with MI, Active Comparator: Control
NCT06489236 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of an Intervention on Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pediatric Nurses and Pediatricians: A Mixed Methods Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2023 to 2024Enrolled142ConditionsVaccination Hesitancy, Pediatric ALL, Presumptive Communication, Motivational InterviewingArmsVaccine Confidence: Skills to Promote Vaccination in the Pediatric Consultations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Perceived feasibility of a multicomponent prenatal intervention on childhood vaccinations: Findings from a national cross-sectional survey of prenatal care providers, April-June 2022.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinician Communication to Address Vaccine Hesitancy.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas J OpelSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA douglas.opel@seattlechildrens.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-191X
Jeffrey D RobinsonDepartment of Communication, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Heather SpielvogleSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Christine SpinaChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kathleen GarrettChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Amanda F DempseyChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Cathryn PerreiraChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Miriam DickinsonChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Chuan ZhouSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Barbara PahudDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
James A TaylorDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sean T O'LearyChildren's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Outcomes Research Consortium · USUniversity of Washington · USPortland State University · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Evaluation of the Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk with Motivational Interviewing (PIVOT with MI) InterventionR01HD093628 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI O'LEARY, SEAN T, OPEL, DOUGLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA key contributor to underimmunisation is parental refusal or delay of vaccines due to vaccine concerns. Many clinicians lack confidence in communicating with vaccine-hesitant parents (VHP) and perceive that their discussions will do little to change parents' minds. Improving clinician communication with VHPs is critical to increasing childhood vaccine uptake. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe the protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the impact of a novel, multifaceted clinician vaccine communication strategy on child immunisation status. The trial will be conducted in 24 primary care practices in two US states (Washington and Colorado). The strategy is called Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk with Motivational Interviewing (PIVOT with MI), and involves clinicians initiating the vaccine conversation with all parents of young children using the presumptive format, and among those parents who resist vaccines, pivoting to using MI. Our primary outcome is the immunisation status of children of VHPs at 19 months, 0 day of age expressed as the percentage of days underimmunised from birth to 19 months for 22 doses of eight vaccines recommended during this interval. Secondary outcomes include clinician experience communicating with VHPs, parent visit experience and clinician adherence to the PIVOT with MI communication strategy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the following institutional review boards: Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board, Washington State Institutional Review Board and Swedish Health Services Institutional Review Board. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03885232.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingVaccinesChildChild, PreschoolColoradoCommunicationHumansInfantParentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccinationWashingtonVaccinescommunity child healthpaediatricspublic health

Identifiers

PMID32784263
PMCPMC7418671
OpenAlexW3048749192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.