Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32784219›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Revealing the reality of undergraduate GP teaching in UK medical curricula: a cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Emily Cottrell, Hugh Alberti, Joe Rosenthal, Lindsey Pope, Trevor Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The NHS 10-year plan: rethinking the delivery of primary care medical education.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Radical solutions are needed to meet the challenge of medical student placement capacity in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. How the RCGP Research Paper of the Year 2020 reflects our mottoThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  9. The reality of undergraduate GP teaching: a medical student's perspective.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  10. Inequalities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  11. Revealing the reality of undergraduate GP teaching in UK medical curricula.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily CottrellSchool of Medical Education, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Hugh AlbertiSchool of Medical Education, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Joe RosenthalResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London.
Lindsey PopeSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Trevor ThompsonUniversity of Bristol, School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTime in general practice offers medical students opportunities to learn a breadth of clinical knowledge and skills relevant to their future clinical practice. Undergraduate experiences shape career decisions and current recommendations are that 25% of undergraduate curriculum time should be focused on general practice. However, previous work demonstrated that GP teaching had plateaued or reduced in UK medical schools. Therefore, an up-to-date description of undergraduate GP teaching is timely.

aimTo describe the current picture of UK undergraduate GP teaching, including the amount of time and resources allocated to GP teaching. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional questionnaire study across 36 UK medical schools.

methodThe questionnaire was designed based on a previous survey performed in 2011-2013, with additional questions on human and financial support allocated to GP teaching. The questionnaire was piloted and revised prior to distribution to leads of undergraduate GP teaching in UK medical schools.

resultsThe questionnaire response rate was 100%. GP teaching constituted an average of 9.2% of medical curricula; this was lower than previous figures, though the actual number of GP sessions has remained static. The majority (

conclusionUndergraduate GP teaching provision has plateaued since 2000 and falls short of national recommendations. Chronic underinvestment in GP teaching persists at a time when teaching is expected to increase. Both aspects need to be addressed to facilitate high-quality undergraduate GP teaching and promotion of the expert medical generalist role.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumHumansSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingUnited Kingdomcostgeneral practicemedical studentsprimary health careteachingworkforce

Identifiers

PMID32784219
PMCPMC7425203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.