ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2020
A Prospective Study on Changes in Auricular Protrusion after Chronic Otitis Media Surgery with the Postauricular Approach.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Objective Auricular Measurements and Patient Satisfaction Following Cartilage-Cutting Otoplasty Using Fascioperichondrial Flaps.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Auricular Protrusion After the Postauricular Approach: A Review of the Current Literature.Cureus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSome patients complain of apparent auricle protrusion after chronic otitis media (COM) surgery with the postauricular approach. This study investigates whether auricular protrusion could be restored to the preoperative state after COM surgery; if so, the time needed after surgery and whether the degree of auricular of protrusion differed according to the surgical procedure. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-seven patients who underwent tympanoplasty and canal wall up and canal wall down mastoidectomy between July 2016 and July 2017 were prospectively studied. To examine the degree of auricular protrusion, the longest distance from the head to the helical rim and the distance from the mastoid process to the helical rim in the plane along the level of the upper margin of the tragus were measured 1 day before surgery and 1 day; 2 weeks; and 1, 2, 4, and 6 months, postoperatively.
resultsThe superior aspect of the auricle returned to the preoperative state within 2 months of surgery, irrespective of the surgical procedure. The middle aspect was restored to the preoperative state within 4 months of tympanoplasty or canal wall up mastoidectomy, and within 2 months of canal wall down mastoidectomy.
conclusionPostoperative auricular protrusion is a transient phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.