Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32783923›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2020

Distant supervision for medical concept normalization.

Nikhil Pattisapu, Vivek Anand, Sangameshwar Patil, Girish Palshikar, Vasudeva Varma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikhil PattisapuInformation Retrieval and Extraction Lab, Kohli Center for Intelligent Systems, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, 500032, India. Electronic address: nikhil.pattisapu@research.iiit.ac.in.
Vivek AnandInformation Retrieval and Extraction Lab, Kohli Center for Intelligent Systems, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, 500032, India. Electronic address: vivek.a@research.iiit.ac.in.
Sangameshwar PatilTata Research Development and Design Centre, Pune 24105, India. Electronic address: sangameshwar.patil@tcs.com.
Girish PalshikarTata Research Development and Design Centre, Pune 24105, India. Electronic address: gk.palshikar@tcs.com.
Vasudeva VarmaInformation Retrieval and Extraction Lab, Kohli Center for Intelligent Systems, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, 500032, India. Electronic address: vv@iiit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the task of Medical Concept Normalization (MCN) which aims to map informal medical phrases such as "loosing weight" to formal medical concepts, such as "Weight loss". Deep learning models have shown high performance across various MCN datasets containing small number of target concepts along with adequate number of training examples per concept. However, scaling these models to millions of medical concepts entails the creation of much larger datasets which is cost and effort intensive. Recent works have shown that training MCN models using automatically labeled examples extracted from medical knowledge bases partially alleviates this problem. We extend this idea by computationally creating a distant dataset from patient discussion forums. We extract informal medical phrases and medical concepts from these forums using a synthetically trained classifier and an off-the-shelf medical entity linker respectively. We use pretrained sentence encoding models to find the k-nearest phrases corresponding to each medical concept. These mappings are used in combination with the examples obtained from medical knowledge bases to train an MCN model. Our approach outperforms the previous state-of-the-art by 15.9% and 17.1% classification accuracy across two datasets while avoiding manual labeling.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNeural Networks, ComputerHumansDeep learningDistant supervisionGraph embeddingMedical concept normalizationText embedding

Identifiers

PMID32783923
PMCPMC7415240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.