Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32783636›Full record

ArticleTraffic injury prevention2020

The impact of interlock installation on driving behavior and drinking behavior related to driving.

Thomas H Nochajski, Amy R Manning, Robert Voas, Eileen P Taylor, Michael Scherer, Eduardo Romano

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Traffic injury prevention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Behaviors and Habits of Young Drivers Living in Small Urban Cities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas H NochajskiSchool of Social Work, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Amy R ManningSchool of Social Work, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Robert VoasPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Eileen P TaylorPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Michael SchererPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Eduardo RomanoPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Institute for Research and Evaluation · USPacific Institute For Research and Evaluation · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Managing Heavy Drinking to Avoid Impaired Driving: A Study of Interlock UsersR01AA022312 · NIAAA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI NOCHAJSKI, THOMAS H, ROMANO, EDUARDO O · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a substantial body of evidence that the recidivism of impaired-driving offenders is reduced while an ignition interlock device (IID) is on their vehicles. This study examines changes in driving behaviors and drinking behaviors used by DWI offenders to manage driving with the IID.

methodsA total of 166 IID participants who completed two surveys covering the period from arrest to IID installation (T1) and during IID use (T2) were examined. Four domains were covered: demographics, driving environments and transportation needs, reported driving activity, and reported drinking activities. Participants were on average 38 years old, 43% were female, 35% completed college, 34% had an income of more than $50,000, and 83% were employed. For those who provided it, the mean blood alcohol content (BAC) at arrest was .184 g/dL, with only 8 (5%) individuals below .08 g/dL, and 93 (56%) at over .18 g/dL. About 45% were repeat DWI offenders.

resultsBetween T1 and T2 there was a slight increase in acknowledging public transportation was available (p=.001), an increase in other individuals driving the interlock-equipped vehicle (p=.002), an increase in the number of vehicles in the household not registered to the DWI offender (p< .001), and an increase in the number of participants who reported that driving was important to their lifestyle (p=.008). Initial (T1) expectations about whether the interlock would be a problem were significantly different from actual experiences reported in T2 (p<.001). With respect to alcohol consumption, 14% reported abstinence at T2 compared to 2% at T1 (p=.001) and the number of drinks per drinking occasion decreased from a mean of 4.90 at T1 to 3.14 at T2 (p=.001), but the number of drinking occasions increased by a third (p=.003). The number of drinking locations (p=.001), the frequency of stopping after work for a drink (p=.001), and drinking at a bar all decreased (p<.001).

conclusionsInterlock users make some adjustments in how they drink, the amount they drink, and where they drink. This finding suggests that there may be methods that can be used to extend the benefits of the IID beyond the sanction period.

Indexed as

Protective DevicesAdultAlcohol DrinkingAutomobile DrivingCriminalsDriving Under the InfluenceFemaleHumansMaleNew YorkProgram EvaluationRecidivismSurveys and Questionnairesdrinking patternsdriving patternsDWI offendersimpaired drivinginterlock

Identifiers

PMID32783636
PMCPMC7879393
OpenAlexW3048626043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.