Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32783535›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental health perspectives2020

A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Occupational Benzene Exposure and Biomarkers of Cytogenetic Damage.

Bernice Scholten, Jelle Vlaanderen, Rob Stierum, Lützen Portengen, Nat Rothman, Qing Lan, Anjoeka Pronk, Roel Vermeulen

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental health perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Benzene Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. F-Doped InNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernice ScholtenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jelle VlaanderenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Rob StierumNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Zeist, Netherlands.
Lützen PortengenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nat RothmanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Qing LanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Anjoeka PronkNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Zeist, Netherlands.
Roel VermeulenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLUtrecht University · NLNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genotoxicity of benzene has been investigated in dozens of biomonitoring studies, mainly by studying (classical) chromosomal aberrations (CAs) or micronuclei (MN) as markers of DNA damage. Both have been shown to be predictive of future cancer risk in cohort studies and could, therefore, potentially be used for risk assessment of genotoxicity-mediated cancers.

objectivesWe sought to estimate an exposure-response curve (ERC) and quantify between-study heterogeneity using all available quantitative evidence on the cytogenetic effects of benzene exposure on CAs and MN respectively.

methodsWe carried out a systematic literature review and summarized all available data of sufficient quality using meta-analyses. We assessed the heterogeneity in slope estimates between studies and conducted additional sensitivity analyses to assess how various study characteristics impacted the estimated ERC.

resultsSixteen CA (1,356 individuals) and DISCUSSION: Our study provides a systematic, transparent, and quantitative summary of the literature describing the strong association between benzene exposure and accepted markers of genotoxicity in humans. The derived consensus slope can be used as a best estimate of the quantitative relationship between real-life benzene exposure and genetic damage in future risk assessment. We also quantitate the large between-study heterogeneity that exists in this literature, a factor which is crucial for the interpretation of single-study or consensus slopes. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6404.

Indexed as

BenzeneBiomarkersCytogenetic AnalysisDNA DamageHumansOccupational ExposureBenzeneBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32783535
PMCPMC7422719
OpenAlexW3048570424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.