Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32783077›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2021

Comparative study of complications after primary and revision transsphenoidal endoscopic surgeries.

Leandro Custódio do Amaral, Baltazar Leão Reis, Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira, Thamires Marx da Silva Santos, Alexandre Varella Giannetti

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acromegaly and male sexual health.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leandro Custódio do Amaral, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. leandroamaral_ns@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1491-364X
Baltazar Leão Reis, Nova Lima, Brazil.
Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Thamires Marx da Silva Santos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alexandre Varella Giannetti, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Biocor Institute · BRInstituto Evandro Chagas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A preferred treatment for residual/recurrent pituitary adenomas has not been established. The existence of higher complication rates for revision surgeries remains under debate. This study aimed to compare complication rates of primary and revision transsphenoidal endoscopic surgeries and to identify risk factors for complications. Data from 144 primary and 39 revision surgeries were analysed. The surgical complications evaluated were intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks; meningitis; permanent diabetes insipidus (DI) and hypopituitarism; worsening visual acuity; ophthalmoplegias; visual field defects; otorhinolaryngological, systemic and vascular complications; and death. The variables that were potentially associated with surgical complications were gender, age, comorbidities, lumbar drain use, duration of lumbar drain use, invasion of the sphenoid and cavernous sinuses, presence and degree of suprasellar expansion, preoperative identification of the pituitary, CSF leaks and intraoperative pituitary identification. Intraoperative CSF leaks, visual field losses and worsening visual acuity were more common for revision surgeries. There were no between-group differences in the occurrence of postoperative CSF leaks; systemic, vascular and otorhinolaryngological complications; meningitis; DI and hypopituitarism; ophthalmoplegias; or death. Intraoperative identification of the pituitary was associated with lower rates of permanent DI and hypopituitarism, systemic complications, intraoperative CSF leaks and worsening visual acuity. Suprasellar expansion increased the risk of intraoperative CSF leaks but not endocrinological deficits or visual impairment. Intraoperative CSF leaks were associated with postoperative CSF leaks, meningitis, anterior hypopituitarism, DI and worsening visual acuity. Intraoperative CSF leaks, worsening visual acuity and visual field losses were more common in reoperated patients.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebrospinal Fluid LeakChildDrainageHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPituitary NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesEndoscopyHypophysectomyPituitary glandPituitary neoplasmsPostoperative complicationsReoperation

Identifiers

PMID32783077
OpenAlexW3048483640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.