Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32783010›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT2020

Presenteeism among health care workers: literature review.

Paulo Henrique Poti Homrich, Fabio Fernandes Dantas-Filho, Laura Luna Martins, Emilian Rejane Marcon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paulo Henrique Poti HomrichDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Clinical Hospital - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil. Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Clinical Hospital Brazil.
Fabio Fernandes Dantas-FilhoDepartment of Occupational Health, Clinical Hospital - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil. Department of Occupational Health Clinical Hospital Brazil.
Laura Luna MartinsMove Research Group, Clinical Hospital - Porto Alegre, (RS), Brazil. Move Research Group Clinical Hospital Brazil.
Emilian Rejane MarconDepartment of Bariatric Surgery/Saint Cecilia Health Basic Unit, Clinical Hospital - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil. Department of Bariatric Surgery Saint Cecilia Health Basic Unit Clinical Hospital Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presenteeism is an occupational and psychosocial phenomenon with negative impact on the work environment. In addition to causing losses in productivity losses, it also has implications for the state of health of workers. Therefore, presenteeism is likely to become a serious public health problem. The aim of the present study was to discuss the implications, means for evaluation and impact of presenteeism on the health and work of health care workers. We performed a literature search in database PubMed using keywords presenteeism, absenteeism, nurse presenteeism, physician presenteeism, sickness presenteeism, physician health organization, and working sick. We conclude that adequate assessment, raising the health managers' awareness about the risks and harms associated with this phenomenon, and developing management tools will contribute to reduce the impact of presenteeism. This seems to be the proper path to make this problem more visible and hinder its growth.

Indexed as

burnouthealthcare workerpresenteeism

Identifiers

PMID32783010
PMCPMC7413686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.