Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782978›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of bioprinting2019

Mechanisms and modeling of electrohydrodynamic phenomena.

Dajing Gao, Donggang Yao, Steven K Leist, Yifan Fei, Jack Zhou

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of bioprinting, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Droplet-based bioprinting.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  5. Microfabrication Technologies for Nanoinvasive and High-Resolution Magnetic Neuromodulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dajing GaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Donggang YaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Steven K LeistDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Yifan FeiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Jack ZhouDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the mechanisms of electrohydrodynamic (EHD) phenomenon. From this review, researchers and students can learn principles and development history of EHD. Significant progress has been identified in research and development of EHD high-resolution deposition as a direct additive manufacturing method, and more effort will be driven to this direction soon. An introduction is given about current trend of additive manufacturing and advantages of EHD inkjet printing. Both theoretical models and experiment approaches about the formation of cone, development of cone-jet transition and stability of jet are presented. The formation of a stable cone-jet is the key factor for precision EHD printing which will be discussed. Different scaling laws can be used to predict the diameter of jet and emitted current in different parametrical ranges. The information available in this review builds a bridge between EHD phenomenon and three-dimensional high-resolution inkjet printing.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingcone-jetElectrohydrodynamicinkjet printingjet stability

Identifiers

PMID32782978
PMCPMC7415859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.