ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2020
Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A network meta-analysis of strategies for endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures from the perspectives of efficacy, duration and safety.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Review
- Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tumors: Training levels and professional roles explored.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Survey of the Actual Practices Used for Endoscopic Removal of Colon Polyps in Korea: A Comparison with the Current Guidelines.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- The Nagoya University and the University of Adelaide Joint PhD Degree Program in Medicine - A Program of Opportunity.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Risk of perforation related to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Is this finally predictable?Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024Article
- Settings of a novel electrosurgical generator to enable efficient and safe submucosal endoscopic procedures.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure. A dissection speed of ≥9 cm
methodsConsecutive patients undergoing colorectal ESD at a Japanese hospital (2006-2017) were included in a prospectively collected database. Information on patient demographics, proceduralist, and intra-/postprocedure data was retrieved. The primary outcome was the comparison in dissection speed. The secondary outcomes included differences in safety and efficacy. Log-linear regression models adjusted for confounders (e.g. R0 resection) were used to assess the differences in dissection speed.
resultsFive hundred ninety procedures (514 patients) performed by 26 endoscopists were analyzed. Experts performed a higher number of difficult lesions (e.g. F2 fibrosis) but achieved higher dissection speed (10.3
conclusionAlthough dissection speed for colorectal ESD was significantly higher for experts, ESDs could be safely and efficaciously performed by ESD trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.