ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2020
Alveolar macrophages in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macrophage Plasticity: Phenotypic and Functional Profiles Across Pathological Microenvironments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo observe alveolar macrophages (AMs) in the microenvironment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND
methods20 NSCLC patients received bronchoalveolar lavage, and the bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected. The phenotypes of AMs were detected by the opal multiplex immunofluorescence assay (mIF), flow cytometry, and western blot.
resultsAMs could easily be made into paraffin sections after agar pre-embedding. The mIF results showed that AMs highly expressed M1-type marker CD86, and M2-type marker CD163 under PerkinElmer Vectra microscope, while there was a significant difference between the expression of CD86 and CD163 (**
conclusionsOur results showed that AMs simultaneously expressed M1-type markers and M2-type markers, while the M2 markers still dominated. This suggests agar pre-embedding is a very convenient method to embed cells to paraffin tissue, so that cell membrane or nuclear antigens are very easily detected by mIF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32782716PMC7414454What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.