Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782680›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2020

Patterns of metastases in cervical cancer: a population-based study.

Shu Zhou, Fang Peng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Secondary Lung Cancer among Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer: A Population-Based Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shu ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Zhejiang Hospital Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang Province, China.
Fang PengDepartment of Pathology, Zhejiang Hospital Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zhejiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the incidence, prognosis, and treatment modality of different metastatic sites in cervical cancer.

methodsWe used the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) database to collect cervical cancer patients with metastasis from 2010-2016. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and log-rank tests were used to compare overall survival between groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used for identifying the prognostic factors in metastatic cervical cancer.

resultsIn total, 1347 patients with distant metastatic cervical cancer were selected for the study. The average age of patients with metastatic cervical cancer was 57 years old. Unmarried white patients were the majority. About 7.9%, 53.3%, and 64.6% patients were treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, respectively. Additionally, lungs were the most common metastatic sites. The survivals of single-site metastases were similar, which were better than multi-organ metastases. Lung metastatic patients were older than other metastatic patients, and with poorer differentiation and higher stage tumors. In terms of treatment, bone metastatic patients were more commonly treated with radiotherapy (68.4%) than other metastatic patterns. Surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy all prolonged survival months of single-site and multi-site metastatic patients. Furthermore, age, ethnicity, tumor stage, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and metastatic sites were independent prognostic factors for patients with metastatic cervical cancer.

conclusionsThis large-population based study showed that the most common metastatic site of cervical cancer is lung. Although lung metastatic patients harbor older ages and poorer differentiation and higher stage tumors than other sites, the prognosis of lung metastasis is similar to other single metastatic sites. However, the single-site metastatic patients survive longer than multi-site metastatic patients. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy all bring benefit to patients with metastases, which may guide the treatment in metastatic cervical cancers.

Indexed as

Cervical cancermetastasisoverall survivalprognosisSEER

Identifiers

PMID32782680
PMCPMC7414489
OpenAlexW3049390746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.