Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782607›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

A 10-gene signature as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≥7.

Xiangkun Wu, Daojun Lv, Ming Lei, Chao Cai, Zhijian Zhao, Md Eftekhar, Di Gu, Yongda Liu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiangkun WuDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, P.R. China.
Daojun LvDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, P.R. China.
Ming LeiDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, P.R. China.
Chao CaiDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, P.R. China.
Zhijian ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, P.R. China.
Md EftekharDepartment of Family Medicine, CanAm International Medical Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518067, P.R. China.
Di GuDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, P.R. China.
Yongda LiuDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, P.R. China.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The time and speed of biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is highly variable. Stratification methods based on TNM staging and Gleason score (GS) do not allow the identification of patients at risk of BCR following RP. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify molecular signatures that can predict BCR risk effectively and facilitate treatment-related decisions for patients with PCa. RNA sequencing data and corresponding clinical data were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Oncomine databases. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed genes in patients with GS=6 and GS ≥7. Cox regression models were used to determine the PCa signature (PCasig) and a clinical nomogram for the prediction of BCR. The performance of nomograms was assessed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and the concordance index (C-index). A PCasig comprising 10 genes, including SEMG2, KCNJ16, TFAP2B, SYCE1, KCNU1, AFP, GUCY1B2, GRIA4, NXPH1 and SOX11, was significantly associated with BCR, which was identified in TCGA cohort [hazard ratio (HR), 5.18; 95% CI, 3.241-8.272; C-index, 0.777] and validated in the Oncomine cohort (HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.39-5.54; C-index, 0.66). The expression levels of SEMG2, KCNJ16 and TFAP2B were downregulated in patients with GS ≥7. The expression levels of SYCE1, KCNU1, AFP, GUCY1B2, GRIA4, NXPH1 and SOX11 were upregulated in patients with GS ≥7. The clinical nomogram was constructed based on the GS and pathologic T stage (HR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.39-5.54; C-index, 0.713). The addition of the PCasig to the clinical nomogram significantly improved prognostic value (HR, 7.25; 95% CI, 4.54-11.56; C-index, 0.782) with an net reclassification improvement of 75.3% (95% CI, 46.8-104.6%). Furthermore, the endogenous expression of each gene in the PCasig was measured in five PCa cell lines and in normal prostate cells, and these genes exhibited different expression levels relative to one another. In conclusion, an PCasig was identified by mining TCGA and successfully validated in an Oncomine cohort. This PCasig was an independent prognostic factor with a greater prognostic value for all patients regardless of GS than traditional clinical variables, which can improve the performance of clinical nomograms in predicting BCR of patients with GS ≥7.

Indexed as

10-gene signaturebiochemical recurrencebioinformatics analysisprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32782607
PMCPMC7400999
OpenAlexW3040720707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.