ArticleOncology letters2020
A 10-gene signature as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≥7.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a cancer metastasis-associated risk model via multi-machine-learning algorithms for prognostic risk evaluation and clinical application in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the prognosis of prostate cancer through metabolic pathways.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Predicting prostate cancer recurrence: Introducing PCRPS, an advanced online web server.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Systematic review and integrated analysis of prognostic gene signatures for prostate cancer patients.Discover oncology · 2023Article
- Prediction of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence by using discretization supports the critical contribution of the extra-cellular matrix genes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Plasma cell-free DNA methylome profiling in pre- and post-surgery oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2023Article
- Tumor immune contexture predicts recurrence after prostatectomy and efficacy of androgen deprivation and immunotherapy in prostate cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic Significance of Amino Acid Metabolism-Related Genes in Prostate Cancer Retrieved by Machine Learning.Cancers · 2023Article
- Diverse functions of the inward-rectifying potassium channel Kir5.1 and its relationship with human diseases.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- An anoikis-related gene signature for prediction of the prognosis in prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A transcriptomic signature for prostate cancer relapse prediction identified from the differentially expressed genes between TP53 mutant and wild-type tumors.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Particle swarm optimization artificial intelligence technique for gene signature discovery in transcriptomic cohorts.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Review
- Synaptonemal complex proteins modulate the level of genome integrity in cancers.Cancer science · 2021Review
- Identification of a Five-Gene Signature Derived From MYCN Amplification and Establishment of a Nomogram for Predicting the Prognosis of Neuroblastoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The time and speed of biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is highly variable. Stratification methods based on TNM staging and Gleason score (GS) do not allow the identification of patients at risk of BCR following RP. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify molecular signatures that can predict BCR risk effectively and facilitate treatment-related decisions for patients with PCa. RNA sequencing data and corresponding clinical data were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Oncomine databases. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed genes in patients with GS=6 and GS ≥7. Cox regression models were used to determine the PCa signature (PCasig) and a clinical nomogram for the prediction of BCR. The performance of nomograms was assessed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and the concordance index (C-index). A PCasig comprising 10 genes, including SEMG2, KCNJ16, TFAP2B, SYCE1, KCNU1, AFP, GUCY1B2, GRIA4, NXPH1 and SOX11, was significantly associated with BCR, which was identified in TCGA cohort [hazard ratio (HR), 5.18; 95% CI, 3.241-8.272; C-index, 0.777] and validated in the Oncomine cohort (HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.39-5.54; C-index, 0.66). The expression levels of SEMG2, KCNJ16 and TFAP2B were downregulated in patients with GS ≥7. The expression levels of SYCE1, KCNU1, AFP, GUCY1B2, GRIA4, NXPH1 and SOX11 were upregulated in patients with GS ≥7. The clinical nomogram was constructed based on the GS and pathologic T stage (HR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.39-5.54; C-index, 0.713). The addition of the PCasig to the clinical nomogram significantly improved prognostic value (HR, 7.25; 95% CI, 4.54-11.56; C-index, 0.782) with an net reclassification improvement of 75.3% (95% CI, 46.8-104.6%). Furthermore, the endogenous expression of each gene in the PCasig was measured in five PCa cell lines and in normal prostate cells, and these genes exhibited different expression levels relative to one another. In conclusion, an PCasig was identified by mining TCGA and successfully validated in an Oncomine cohort. This PCasig was an independent prognostic factor with a greater prognostic value for all patients regardless of GS than traditional clinical variables, which can improve the performance of clinical nomograms in predicting BCR of patients with GS ≥7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.