Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782574›Full record

ReviewOncology letters2020

Effects of aspirin on the gastrointestinal tract: Pros vs. cons.

Zhuoya Li, Zheng Wang, Baile Shen, Chen Chen, Xiaoyun Ding, Haojun Song

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dihydrogeodin fromMarine drugs · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Aspirin Caused Intestinal Damage through FXR and ET-1 Signaling Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Study on the effect and mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. P2YJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  17. Drug repurposing-an emerging strategy in cancer therapeutics.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhuoya LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, P.R. China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, P.R. China.
Baile ShenDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, P.R. China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, P.R. China.
Xiaoyun DingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, P.R. China.
Haojun SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, P.R. China.
Ningbo First Hospital · CNNingbo University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetylsalicylic acid, also known as aspirin, is often used in clinical antipyretic, analgesic and antiplatelet therapy. Aspirin can cause numerous side effects in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, ranging from unpleasant GI symptoms without gastric mucosal lesions to ulcer bleeding and even death. However, recent studies have found that aspirin can significantly prevent GI tumors. Despite impressive advances in cancer research, screening and treatment options, GI tumors remain a leading cause of death worldwide. Prevention is a far better option than treatment for tumors. Therefore, the present review assesses the pros and cons of aspirin on the GI tract and, on this the basis, the appropriate dose of aspirin to protect it.

Indexed as

aspirineffectgastrointestinal benefitgastrointestinal cancergastrointestinal side effects

Identifiers

PMID32782574
PMCPMC7400979
OpenAlexW3039542540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.