Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782543›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

Lenvatinib prolongs the progression-free survival time of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization: A multicenter cohort study using data mining analysis.

Shigeo Shimose, Takumi Kawaguchi, Masatoshi Tanaka, Hideki Iwamoto, Ken Miyazaki, Etsuko Moriyama, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Takashi Niizeki, Tomotake Shirono, Masahito Nakano and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinibWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shigeo ShimoseDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Takumi KawaguchiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Masatoshi TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokokura Hospital, Miyama, Fukuoka 839-0295, Japan.
Hideki IwamotoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Ken MiyazakiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Etsuko MoriyamaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Hiroyuki SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Takashi NiizekiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Tomotake ShironoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Masahito NakanoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Hideya SugaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yanagawa Hospital, Yanagawa, Fukuoka 832-0077, Japan.
Taizo YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iwamoto Internal Medical Clinic, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 802-0832, Japan.
Yoshinori YokokuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokokura Hospital, Miyama, Fukuoka 839-0295, Japan.
Kazunori NoguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Omuta City Hospital, Omuta, Fukuoka 836-8567, Japan.
Hironori KogaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
Takuji TorimuraDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are considered for use in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of the present retrospective study was to identify factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and to evaluate the indications for lenvatinib treatment in patients with intermediate-stage HCC refractory to TACE using a data-mining analysis. A total of 171 patients with intermediate-stage HCC refractory to TACE were included. All patients were classified into three groups according to their HCC treatment: Lenvatinib (n=45), sorafenib (n=53) and TACE (n=73) groups. PFS time was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using a log-rank test. Factors associated with PFS time were evaluated using multivariate and decision-tree analyses. The median PFS time was 5.8, 3.2 and 2.4 months in the lenvatinib, sorafenib and TACE groups, respectively (P<0.001). In the Cox regression analysis, lenvatinib treatment and being within the up-to-seven criteria were identified as independent factors for PFS (lenvatinib, P<0.0001; within up-to-seven, P=0.001). The decision-tree analysis revealed that patients beyond the up-to-seven criteria, treated with lenvatinib and with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 had a longer PFS time (245.2±107.9 days) than patients beyond the up-to-seven criteria, treated with lenvatinib and with ALBI grade 2 (147.1±78.6 days). Additionally, lenvatinib was independently associated with longer PFS time in patients with intermediate-stage HCC refractory to TACE. Therefore, lenvatinib may be recommended for patients who have intermediate-stage HCC refractory to TACE, ALBI grade 1 and who are within the up-to-seven criteria.

Indexed as

hepatomaintermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinomalenvatinibprogression-free survivaltransarterial chemoembolization failuretyrosine-kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID32782543
PMCPMC7400966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.