Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782540›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

Value of shear wave elastography in the diagnosis and evaluation of cervical cancer.

Bing Fu, Hong Zhang, Zhen-Wei Song, Ji-Xiang Lu, Shi-Hui Wu, Jie Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bing FuDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, P.R. China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Archives, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong 276003, P.R. China.
Zhen-Wei SongDepartment of Medical Imaging, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong 276003, P.R. China.
Ji-Xiang LuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong 276003, P.R. China.
Shi-Hui WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong 276003, P.R. China.
Jie LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, P.R. China.
Linyi People's Hospital · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore the value of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the differential diagnosis of cervical disease and to evaluate the infiltration of cervical cancer. A total of 40 inpatients with cervical cancer, 40 inpatients with cervical benign lesion and 40 healthy volunteers encountered between October 2014 and January 2017 were enrolled. All patients and volunteers underwent conventional ultrasound (US) and SWE examinations. The malignancy and the size (including long, tranverse and anteroposterior diameter) of the lesion were assessed on US. The elastic score, strain ratio, shear wave speed (SWS) and the size of lesions were determined on SWE. Infiltration of the uterus and vaginal vault were also evaluated on US and SWE. The SWS values of cervical cancers, cervical benign lesions and normal cervixes groups were compared. The results suggested that the optimal cut-off elasticity score for predicting cervical cancers was 3 points. The strain ratio between the cervical cancers and the cervical benign lesions exhibited a significant difference (P<0.01). The mean value of SWS for cervical cancers was significantly higher than that of cervical benign lesions and normal cervix (P<0.05). Regarding the lesion size and volume, SWE and pathological measurements were larger than those determined by US (P<0.05 for each). The lesion volume on SWE and pathological measurements exhibited no significant difference (P>0.05). Compared to the pathological diagnosis of focal infiltration of uterus and vaginal vault, the diagnostic accuracy of SWE was higher than that of US. In conclusion, SWE may be used to differentiate between cervical benign lesions and cervical cancers. The elastic score, strain ratio and SWS of cervical cancers were higher than those of cervical benign lesions. Furthermore, SWE is able to evaluate the infiltration of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

cervical cancerdiagnosisinfiltrationshear wave elastographyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32782540
PMCPMC7400132
OpenAlexW3036703576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.