Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782523›Full record

ReviewOncology letters2020

Timing of breast cancer surgery during the menstrual cycle-is there an optimal time of the month?

Sarah M Bernhardt, Pallave Dasari, David Walsh, Amanda R Townsend, Timothy J Price, Wendy V Ingman

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah M BernhardtDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia.
Pallave DasariDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia.
David WalshDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia.
Amanda R TownsendDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia.
Timothy J PriceDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia.
Wendy V IngmanDiscipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An intriguing relationship between menstrual cycle phase at the time of breast cancer surgery and clinical outcomes was first proposed in the late 1980s. Despite a number of clinical studies conducted to address this, as well as meta-analyses and systematic reviews, there remains significant controversy surrounding the effect of menstrual cycle phase at time of surgery on the prognosis of premenopausal breast cancer. While some studies have suggested that surgery performed during the luteal phase results in the most favourable outcome, other studies report the follicular phase is more favourable, and others show no association. Given the conflicting results, there remains insufficient evidence to determine whether there is an optimal time of the month to perform surgery. This issue has dogged breast cancer surgery for decades; knowledge of an optimal time of the month to conduct surgery would be a simple approach to improving patient outcomes. This review explores the potential biological mechanisms through which the hormonal milieu might contribute to differences in prognosis, and why clinical findings are so variable. It is concluded that a significant problem with current clinical research is the lack of insight from mechanistic studies. While there are a number of plausible biological mechanisms that could lead to altered survival, supporting evidence is limited. There are also variable approaches to defining the menstrual cycle phase and hormone receptor status of the tumour and few studies controlled for prognostic factors such as tumour size and stage, or addressed the impact of adjuvant treatments. Elucidation of the specific confounding factors, as well as biological mechanistic pathways that could explain the potential relationship between timing of surgery and survival, will greatly assist in designing robust well-controlled prospective clinical studies to evaluate this paradigm.

Indexed as

breast cancerestrogenmenstrual cycleprogesteronetumour biology

Identifiers

PMID32782523
PMCPMC7400969
OpenAlexW3037645761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.