Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782490›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2020

Health-related quality of life in premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy: results from a phase III randomized clinical trial (MONALEESA-7).

Nadia Harbeck, Fabio Franke, Rafael Villanueva-Vazquez, Yen-Shen Lu, Debu Tripathy, Louis Chow, Govind K Babu, Young-Hyuck Im, David Chandiwana, Anil Gaur and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Nadia HarbeckBreast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCCLMU, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, München, 81377, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-7372
Fabio FrankeHospital de Caridade de Ijuí, CACON, Ijuí, Brazil.
Rafael Villanueva-VazquezInstitut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain.
Yen-Shen LuNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-1291
Debu TripathyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Louis ChowOrganisation for Oncology and Translational Research, Hong Kong.
Govind K BabuHCG Curie Centre of Oncology and Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Young-Hyuck ImSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
David ChandiwanaNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Anil GaurNovartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
Brad LanoueNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Karen Rodriguez-LorencNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Aditya BardiaMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Novartis (United States) · USHarvard University · USHospital Universitário Cajuru · BRInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESKidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology · INLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNovartis (India) · INSamsung Medical Center · KRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUnimed Medical Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis analysis evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial, which previously demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with ribociclib (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) + endocrine therapy (ET) compared with placebo + ET in pre- and perimenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC).

methodsThe European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and the EQ-5D-5L were used to evaluate HRQoL.

resultsEORTC QLQ-C30 assessments were evaluable for 335 patients in the ribociclib arm and 337 patients in the placebo arm. Adherence rates at baseline and ⩾1 postbaseline time point were 90% and 83%, respectively. Patients treated with ribociclib + ET had a longer time to deterioration (TTD) ⩾ 10% in global HRQoL {hazard ratio (HR), 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.86]}. TTD ⩾ 10% in global HRQoL was delayed in ribociclib-treated patients without

conclusionHRQoL was maintained longer in patients who received ribociclib + ET

Indexed as

breast cancerendocrine therapyquality of liferibociclib

Identifiers

PMID32782490
PMCPMC7385843
OpenAlexW3045121257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.