Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782455›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2020

Maize tassels detection: a benchmark of the state of the art.

Hongwei Zou, Hao Lu, Yanan Li, Liang Liu, Zhiguo Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dynamic Color Transform Networks for Wheat Head Detection.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongwei Zou *Key Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligent Control, School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074 China.
Hao Lu *Key Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligent Control, School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074 China.
Yanan LiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, 430205 China.
Liang LiuKey Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligent Control, School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074 China.
Zhiguo CaoKey Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligent Control, School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074 China.ORCID 0000-0002-9223-1863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe population of plants is a crucial indicator in plant phenotyping and agricultural production, such as growth status monitoring, yield estimation, and grain depot management. To enhance the production efficiency and liberate labor force, many automated counting methods have been proposed, in which computer vision-based approaches show great potentials due to the feasibility of high-throughput processing and low cost. In particular, with the success of deep learning, more and more deeper learning-based approaches are introduced to deal with agriculture automation. Since different detection- and regression-based counting models have distinct characteristics, how to choose an appropriate model given the target task at hand remains unexplored and is important for practitioners.

resultsTargeting in-field maize tassels as a representative case study, the goal of this work is to present a comprehensive benchmark of state-of-the-art object detection and object counting methods, including Faster R-CNN, YOLOv3, FaceBoxes, RetinaNet, and the leading counting model of maize tassels-TasselNet. We create a Maize Tassel Detection Counting (MTDC) dataset by supplementing bounding box annotations to the Maize Tassels Counting (MTC) dataset to allow the training of detection models. We investigate key factors effecting the practical applications of the models, such as convergence behavior, scale robustness, speed-accuracy trade-off, as well as parameter sensitivity. Based on our benchmark, we summarise the advantages and limitations of each method and suggest several possible directions to improve current detection- and regression-based counting approaches to benefit next-generation intelligent agriculture.

conclusionsCurrent state-of-the-art detection- and regression-based counting approaches can all achieve a relatively high degree of accuracy when dealing with in-field maize tassels, with at least 0.85

Indexed as

Computer VisionConvolutional neural networksDeep learningMaize tasselsObject countingObject detection

Identifiers

PMID32782455
PMCPMC7414585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.