Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782453›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2020

Wheat ear counting using K-means clustering segmentation and convolutional neural network.

Xin Xu, Haiyang Li, Fei Yin, Lei Xi, Hongbo Qiao, Zhaowu Ma, Shuaijie Shen, Binchao Jiang, Xinming Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A density map-based method for counting wheat ears.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic Inheritance of Stripe Rust (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xin XuHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.
Haiyang LiHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.
Fei YinHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.
Lei XiHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.
Hongbo QiaoHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.
Zhaowu MaHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.
Shuaijie ShenHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.
Binchao JiangHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.
Xinming MaHenan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002 China.ORCID 0000-0001-9137-497X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWheat yield is influenced by the number of ears per unit area, and manual counting has traditionally been used to estimate wheat yield. To realize rapid and accurate wheat ear counting, K-means clustering was used for the automatic segmentation of wheat ear images captured by hand-held devices. The segmented data set was constructed by creating four categories of image labels: non-wheat ear, one wheat ear, two wheat ears, and three wheat ears, which was then was sent into the convolution neural network (CNN) model for training and testing to reduce the complexity of the model.

resultsThe recognition accuracy of non-wheat, one wheat, two wheat ears, and three wheat ears were 99.8, 97.5, 98.07, and 98.5%, respectively. The model

conclusionsThe classification of segmented images as opposed to target recognition not only reduces the workload of manual annotation but also improves significantly the efficiency and accuracy of wheat ear counting, thus meeting the requirements of wheat yield estimation in the field environment.

Indexed as

CNNCrop yieldDeep learningK-meansRecognitionsSegmentationWheat ear counting

Identifiers

PMID32782453
PMCPMC7412807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.