Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782431›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology insights2020

Vitamin D Supplementation in Laboratory-Bred Mice: An In Vivo Assay on Gut Microbiome and Body Weight.

Lorina Ineta Badger-Emeka, Zainab Yaseen AlJaziri, Cereen Fahad Almulhim, Asma Saleh Aldrees, Zainab Hamzah AlShakhs, Reem Ibrahim AlAithan, Fatimah Abdullah Alothman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology insights, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vitamin D is glucoprotective in aging males but not females.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorina Ineta Badger-EmekaCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-6215
Zainab Yaseen AlJaziriCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Cereen Fahad AlmulhimCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Asma Saleh AldreesCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab Hamzah AlShakhsCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Reem Ibrahim AlAithanCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah Abdullah AlothmanCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saudi Arabia is in a tropical geographical region with a population that has access to adequate diet. There is, however, a high level of vitamin D deficiency in the Kingdom, comorbid with other disease. There is the postulation of a correlation between a healthy gut microbiota and balanced levels of serum vitamin D. This investigation looks into the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the gut flora of laboratory-bred mice as well as any possible association on body weight. BALB/C mice weighing between 34 and 35.8 g were divided into 4 groups and placed on daily doses of vitamin D of 3.75 µg (low dose), 7.5 µg (normal dose), and 15 µg (high dose). The fourth group was the control group that did not receive any supplementation with vitamin D. Body weights were monitored on weekly basis, while faecal samples from the rectum were obtained for microbial culturing and the monitoring of bacterial colony count using the Vitek 2 Compact automated system (BioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) according to manufacturer's guidelines. The data presented as mean ± SD, while significant differences were determined with 2-way analysis of variance in comparing differences within and between treatment groups. The different doses of vitamin D showed varying effects on the body weight and gut microbial colonies of the mice. There was a highly significant difference between the control, 15 µg (high), and 7.5 µg (normal) dose groups. This is suggestive that supplementation with vitamin D could a role in the gut microbial flora in the gut which could reflect in changes in body weight.

Indexed as

body weightgut microbiotaVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID32782431
PMCPMC7388085
OpenAlexW3045544765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.