ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2020
In Silico Investigation of First-Pass Effect on Selected Small Molecule Excipients and Structural Dynamics of P-glycoprotein.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functionalized albumin nanoparticles: A multifunctional platform for enhanced brain drug delivery.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Virtual screening,Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- Non-nutritive sweeteners in food-drug interactions: An overview of current evidence.Molecular pharmacology · 2025Review
- In silico molecular targets, docking, dynamics simulation and physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling of oritavancin.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2024Article
- Predictive Potential of BCS and Pharmacokinetic Parameters on Study Outcome: Analysis of 198 In Vivo Bioequivalence Studies.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2023Article
- In Silico Exploration of Metabolically Active Peptides as Potential Therapeutic Agents against Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, the interaction of selected pharmaceutical excipients on the function of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and activity of 6 cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms were computationally investigated. At binding free energy cut-off value of -5.0 kcal/mol, the result showed possible modulatory or inhibitory effect by cethyl alcohol on CPY3A4 and P-gp; cetyltrimethyl-ammonium bromide (CTAB) on CYP1A2 and P-gp; dibutyl sebacate on CYP2C9, CYP2E1, and P-gp; sodium caprylate on CYP1A2 and CYP3A4; while most of the tested excipients have good interaction with the cytochromes and P-gp. The predicted pharmacokinetics provided possible inhibitors of the CYPs and P-gp and suggested that aspartame and acetyl tributyl citrate may not permeate blood-brain barrier and not act as P-gp substrates. Target prediction for CTAB showed 100% and 35% probability of target to dynamin-1 (UniProt ID: Q05193) and histamine H3 receptor (UniProt ID: Q9Y5N1), respectively, whereas tricaprylin showed 40% probability of target to 5 Protein kinase C (UniProt IDs: P17252, Q02156, Q04759, P24723, and P05129). This study shows that synergistic effect of some excipients present in a drug formulation and multiple drugs administration is possible through modulation of CYPs activities and P-gp function, and this is crucial for consideration to mitigate toxicity in pediatric and adult populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.