Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782410›Full record

ArticleScientific data2020

An annotated fluorescence image dataset for training nuclear segmentation methods.

Florian Kromp, Eva Bozsaky, Fikret Rifatbegovic, Lukas Fischer, Magdalena Ambros, Maria Berneder, Tamara Weiss, Daria Lazic, Wolfgang Dörr, Allan Hanbury and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. AneRBC dataset: a benchmark dataset for computer-aided anemia diagnosis using RBC images.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. DLSIA: Deep Learning for Scientific Image Analysis.Journal of applied crystallography · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Florian Kromp *Tumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria. florian.kromp@ccri.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4557-5652
Eva Bozsaky *Tumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Fikret RifatbegovicTumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-2382
Lukas FischerSoftware Competence Center Hagenberg GmbH (SCCH), Softwarepark 21, 4232, Hagenberg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-6638
Magdalena AmbrosTumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Maria BernederTumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Tamara WeissTumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Daria LazicTumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang DörrATRAB-Applied and Translational Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Allan HanburyInstitute of Information Systems Engineering, TU Wien, Favoritenstrasse 9-11/194, 1040, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7149-5843
Klaus BeiskeDepartment of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausséen 64, N-0379, Oslo, Norway.
Peter F AmbrosTumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5507-7211
Inge M AmbrosTumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sabine Taschner-MandlTumor biology group, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Zimmermannplatz 10, 1090, Vienna, Austria. sabine.taschner@ccri.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-5301
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research · ATCancer Research Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKMedical University of Vienna · ATOslo University Hospital · NOSoftware Competence Center Hagenberg (Austria) · ATTU Wien · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fully-automated nuclear image segmentation is the prerequisite to ensure statistically significant, quantitative analyses of tissue preparations,applied in digital pathology or quantitative microscopy. The design of segmentation methods that work independently of the tissue type or preparation is complex, due to variations in nuclear morphology, staining intensity, cell density and nuclei aggregations. Machine learning-based segmentation methods can overcome these challenges, however high quality expert-annotated images are required for training. Currently, the limited number of annotated fluorescence image datasets publicly available do not cover a broad range of tissues and preparations. We present a comprehensive, annotated dataset including tightly aggregated nuclei of multiple tissues for the training of machine learning-based nuclear segmentation algorithms. The proposed dataset covers sample preparation methods frequently used in quantitative immunofluorescence microscopy. We demonstrate the heterogeneity of the dataset with respect to multiple parameters such as magnification, modality, signal-to-noise ratio and diagnosis. Based on a suggested split into training and test sets and additional single-nuclei expert annotations, machine learning-based image segmentation methods can be trained and evaluated.

Indexed as

FluorescenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMicroscopy, FluorescenceAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID32782410
PMCPMC7419523
OpenAlexW3048399453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.