Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32782382›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2021

Outcomes in first relapsed-refractory younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma: results from the MANTLE-FIRST study.

Carlo Visco, Alice Di Rocco, Andrea Evangelista, Francesca Maria Quaglia, Maria Chiara Tisi, Lucia Morello, Vittorio Ruggero Zilioli, Chiara Rusconi, Stefan Hohaus, Roberta Sciarra and 23 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [The guideline of the diagnosis and treatment of mantle cell lymphoma in China (2022)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Carlo ViscoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. carlo.visco@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2863-0883
Alice Di RoccoDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Andrea EvangelistaUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy.
Francesca Maria QuagliaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4347-3775
Maria Chiara TisiCell Therapy and Hematology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Lucia MorelloUnit of Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Vittorio Ruggero ZilioliHematology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Chiara RusconiHematology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Stefan HohausHematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-7197
Roberta SciarraHaematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandro ReHematology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Cristina TecchioDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Annalisa ChiappellaHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ana Marin-NieblaHematology, Vall d'Hebron Institut of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7592-6815
Rory McCullochHaematology, University of Plymouth and Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Guido GiniHematology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Tommasina PerroneHematology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Luca NassiHematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
Elsa PenneseHematology, UOSD "Centro Diagnosi e Terapia dei Linfomi", PO Santo Spirito, Pescara, Italy.
Piero Maria StefaniHematology, General Hospital Ca' Foncello, Treviso, Italy.
Maria Christina CoxHematology, AOU Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy.
Valentina BozzoliHematology, P.O. V. Fazzi, Lecce, Italy.
Alberto FabbriHematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese & University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Valentina PolliHematology, Ospedale degli Infermi, Rimini, Italy.
Simone FerreroHematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino/"Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Maria Isabel Alvarez De CelisHematology, AUSLL/IRCCS Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Antonello SicaHematology, Policlinico di Napoli, Napoli, Italy.
Luca PetrucciDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Luca ArcainiHaematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9504-991X
Simon RuleHaematology, University of Plymouth and Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8937-6351
Mauro KramperaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-2040
Umberto VitoloCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (Turin), Italy.
Monica BalzarottiUnit of Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) that fail induction treatment represent a difficult-to-treat population, where no standard therapy exists. We evaluated outcomes in patients with first relapsed-refractory (r/r) MCL after upfront high dose cytarabine including standard regimens. Overall survival (OS-2) and progression-free survival (PFS-2) were estimated from the time of salvage therapy. The previously described threshold of 24 months was used to define patients as early- or late-progressors (POD). Overall, 261 r/r MCL patients were included. Second-line regimens consisted of rituximab-bendamustine (R-B, 21%), R-B and cytarabine (R-BAC, 29%), ibrutinib (19%), and others (31%). The four groups were balanced in terms of clinicopathological features. Adjusting for age and early/late-POD, patients treated with R-BAC had significantly higher complete remission (63%) than comparators. Overall, Ibrutinib and R-BAC were associated with improved median PFS-2 [24 and 25 months, respectively], compared to R-B (13) or others (7). In patients with early-POD (n = 127), ibrutinib was associated with inferior risk of death than comparators (HR 2.41 for R-B, 2.17 for others, 2.78 for R-BAC). In patients with late-POD (n = 134), no significant differences were observed between ibrutinib and bendamustine-based treatments. Ibrutinib was associated with improved outcome in early-POD patients.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternational AgenciesLymphoma, Mantle-CellMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.