Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781990›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Concurrent validity and reliability of measuring range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation test with a novel digital goniometer.

Kerstin Luedtke, Thomas Schoettker-Königer, Toby Hall, Christine Reimer, Maike Grassold, Petra Hasselhoff-Styhler, Christian Neulinger, Max Obrocki, Philipp Przyhoda, Axel Schäfer

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05568173 (Comparison of the Effects of Boxing and Scapular Stabilization Training in Hemiparetic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05568173 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effects of Boxing and Scapular Stabilization Training in Hemiparetic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Mediterranean UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsStroke, HemiparesisArmsBoxing Training, Scapular Stabilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Use of the Zebris Ultrasonic Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis System to Evaluate Range of Motion of the Cervical Spine in 61 Healthy Adults.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kerstin LuedtkeLaboratory of Pain Research, Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland. Kerstin.luedtke@uni-luebeck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7308-5469
Thomas Schoettker-KönigerFaculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Science and Art (HAWK), Goschentor 1, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.
Toby HallSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Christine ReimerFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Neustadtswall 30, 28199, Bremen, Germany.
Maike GrassoldFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Neustadtswall 30, 28199, Bremen, Germany.
Petra Hasselhoff-StyhlerFaculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Science and Art (HAWK), Goschentor 1, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.
Christian NeulingerFaculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Science and Art (HAWK), Goschentor 1, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.
Max ObrockiFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Neustadtswall 30, 28199, Bremen, Germany.
Philipp PrzyhodaFaculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Science and Art (HAWK), Goschentor 1, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.
Axel SchäferFaculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Science and Art (HAWK), Goschentor 1, 31134, Hildesheim, Germany.
University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen · DEHochschule Bremen · DECurtin University · AUInstitute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeadache is a common and costly health problem. Although the pathogenesis of headache is heterogeneous, reported contributing factors are dysfunctions of the upper cervical spine. The flexion rotation test (FRT) is a commonly used diagnostic test to detect upper cervical movement impairment. A digital goniometer may support precise measurement of movement impairment in the upper cervical spine. However, its reliability and validity is not assessed, yet. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the digital goniometer compared to an ultrasound-based movement analysis system.

methodsTwo separate cross-sectional studies were conducted using the digital goniometer EasyAngle (Meloq AB, Stockholm, Sweden) for a) investigating the concurrent validity of upper cervical range of motion (ROM) during the FRT and b) determining the inter- and intra-rater reliability in the target population of patients with head and neck pain. Sixty-two participants, 39 with and 23 without head and neck pain, were recruited for the concurrent validity study. For the reliability study, a total of 50 participants were recruited. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland Altmann plots were used to assess validity and ICC values, Bland Altmann plots as well as Kappa coefficients were used for estimating intra-rater and inter-rater reliability.

resultsConcurrent validity was strong with an ICC (2,1) of 0.97 for ROM to either side (95%CI = 0.95-0.98). Bland Altman Plots revealed a mean difference between measurement systems of 0.5° for the left and 0.11° for the right side. The inter-rater ICC (2,1) was 0.66 (95%CI 0.47-0.79, p <  0.001, SEM 6.6°), indicating good reliability. The limits of agreement were between 10.25° and - 11.89°, the mean difference between both raters was - 0.82°. Intra-rater reliability for the measurement of ROM during the FRT was between 0.96 (ICC 3,1) for rater 1 and 0.94 (ICC 3,1) for rater 2.

conclusionsThe digital goniometer demonstrated strong concurrent validity and good to strong reliability and can be used in clinical practice to accurately determine movement impairment in the upper cervical spine.

trial registrationGerman Registry of Clinical Trials DRKS00013051 .

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsRotationSwedenCervicalFlexion-rotation-testGoniometerHeadacheInter-raterIntra-raterNeck painReliabilityValidityZebris

Identifiers

PMID32781990
PMCPMC7422569
OpenAlexW3048941764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.