Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781943›Full record

ArticleStroke2020

Machine Learning Prediction of Stroke Mechanism in Embolic Strokes of Undetermined Source.

Hooman Kamel, Babak B Navi, Neal S Parikh, Alexander E Merkler, Peter M Okin, Richard B Devereux, Jonathan W Weinsaft, Jiwon Kim, Jim W Cheung, Luke K Kim and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Research square · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Primer on Machine Learning in Electrophysiology.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Machine Learning and the Conundrum of Stroke Risk Prediction.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hooman KamelClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (H.K., B.B.N., N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Babak B NaviClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (H.K., B.B.N., N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Neal S ParikhClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (H.K., B.B.N., N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Alexander E MerklerClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (H.K., B.B.N., N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Peter M OkinDivision of Cardiology (P.M.O., R.B.D., J.W.W., J.K., J.W.C., L.K.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Richard B DevereuxDivision of Cardiology (P.M.O., R.B.D., J.W.W., J.K., J.W.C., L.K.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Jonathan W WeinsaftDivision of Cardiology (P.M.O., R.B.D., J.W.W., J.K., J.W.C., L.K.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Jiwon KimDivision of Cardiology (P.M.O., R.B.D., J.W.W., J.K., J.W.C., L.K.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Jim W CheungDivision of Cardiology (P.M.O., R.B.D., J.W.W., J.K., J.W.C., L.K.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Luke K KimDivision of Cardiology (P.M.O., R.B.D., J.W.W., J.K., J.W.C., L.K.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Barbara CasadeiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (B.C.).
Costantino IadecolaClinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (H.K., B.B.N., N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Mert R SabuncuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (M.R.S.).
Ajay GuptaDepartment of Radiology (A.G.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Iván DíazDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (I.D.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Cornell University · USTwitter (United States) · US

Funding

MRI Detection of CarotId Plaques as a mecHanism for Embolic strokes of undeteRmined source (MRI DECIPHER)R01HL144541 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GUPTA, AJAY, KAMEL, HOOMAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
Left Atrial abNormality, ThromboEmbolism, and Race: Novel risk factors for stroke (LANTERN)R01NS097443 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI KAMEL, HOOMAN · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
British Heart Foundation CH/12/3/29609British Heart Foundation RG/16/12/32451NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144541NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeOne-fifth of ischemic strokes are embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Their theoretical causes can be classified as cardioembolic versus noncardioembolic. This distinction has important implications, but the categories' proportions are unknown.

methodsUsing data from the Cornell Acute Stroke Academic Registry, we trained a machine-learning algorithm to distinguish cardioembolic versus non-cardioembolic strokes, then applied the algorithm to ESUS cases to determine the predicted proportion with an occult cardioembolic source. A panel of neurologists adjudicated stroke etiologies using standard criteria. We trained a machine learning classifier using data on demographics, comorbidities, vitals, laboratory results, and echocardiograms. An ensemble predictive method including L1 regularization, gradient-boosted decision tree ensemble (XGBoost), random forests, and multivariate adaptive splines was used. Random search and cross-validation were used to tune hyperparameters. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation among cases of known etiology. We applied the final algorithm to an independent set of ESUS cases to determine the predicted mechanism (cardioembolic or not). To assess our classifier's validity, we correlated the predicted probability of a cardioembolic source with the eventual post-ESUS diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.

resultsAmong 1083 strokes with known etiologies, our classifier distinguished cardioembolic versus noncardioembolic cases with excellent accuracy (area under the curve, 0.85). Applied to 580 ESUS cases, the classifier predicted that 44% (95% credibility interval, 39%-49%) resulted from cardiac embolism. Individual ESUS patients' predicted likelihood of cardiac embolism was associated with eventual atrial fibrillation detection (OR per 10% increase, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.03-1.57];

conclusionsA machine learning estimator that distinguished known cardioembolic versus noncardioembolic strokes indirectly estimated that 44% of ESUS cases were cardioembolic.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAtrial FibrillationDecision TreesElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntracranial EmbolismMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesReproducibility of Resultsatrial fibrillationembolismmachine learningprobabilitystroke

Identifiers

PMID32781943
PMCPMC8034802
OpenAlexW3048851138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.