ArticleStroke2020
Machine Learning Prediction of Stroke Mechanism in Embolic Strokes of Undetermined Source.
Article in Stroke, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative New-Onset Heart Block in Noncardiac Surgery: Model Development, Validation, and Long-Term Prognostic Analysis.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Current State of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Noncontact Monitoring and AI-Driven Stroke Prediction: National Center for Neurological Disorders-Based Approach Using Smart Beds.Health care science · 2025Article
- A review of machine learning applications in heart health.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- The potential role of cardiac CT in ischemic stroke: bridging cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Review
- The Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Management of Atrial Fibrillation.Cureus · 2025Review
- Using clinical data to reclassify ESUS patients to large artery atherosclerotic or cardioembolic stroke mechanisms.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Predictive etiological classification of acute ischemic stroke through interpretable machine learning algorithms: a multicenter, prospective cohort study.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Heart-Brain Connections: A Narrative Review on Algorithms Utilization in Clinical Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- StrokeClassifier: ischemic stroke etiology classification by ensemble consensus modeling using electronic health records.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Deep Learning-Based Automatic Classification of Ischemic Stroke Subtype Using Diffusion-Weighted Images.Journal of stroke · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Contrast Medium Doses for Computed Tomography Angiography Using Optimized Clinical Parameter Sets.Methods of information in medicine · 2024Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scoping Review.Neurointervention · 2024Review
- RGX Ensemble Model for Advanced Prediction of Mortality Outcomes in Stroke Patients.BME frontiers · 2024Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke Subtypes According to Toast Classification: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Integrated Machine Learning Decision Tree Model for Risk Evaluation in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation When Taking Different Doses of Dabigatran.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Primer on Machine Learning in Electrophysiology.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023Review
- Neuroimaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Multimodal Imaging Approach for Acute Endovascular Therapy.Journal of stroke · 2023Review
- Machine Learning and the Conundrum of Stroke Risk Prediction.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeOne-fifth of ischemic strokes are embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Their theoretical causes can be classified as cardioembolic versus noncardioembolic. This distinction has important implications, but the categories' proportions are unknown.
methodsUsing data from the Cornell Acute Stroke Academic Registry, we trained a machine-learning algorithm to distinguish cardioembolic versus non-cardioembolic strokes, then applied the algorithm to ESUS cases to determine the predicted proportion with an occult cardioembolic source. A panel of neurologists adjudicated stroke etiologies using standard criteria. We trained a machine learning classifier using data on demographics, comorbidities, vitals, laboratory results, and echocardiograms. An ensemble predictive method including L1 regularization, gradient-boosted decision tree ensemble (XGBoost), random forests, and multivariate adaptive splines was used. Random search and cross-validation were used to tune hyperparameters. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation among cases of known etiology. We applied the final algorithm to an independent set of ESUS cases to determine the predicted mechanism (cardioembolic or not). To assess our classifier's validity, we correlated the predicted probability of a cardioembolic source with the eventual post-ESUS diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
resultsAmong 1083 strokes with known etiologies, our classifier distinguished cardioembolic versus noncardioembolic cases with excellent accuracy (area under the curve, 0.85). Applied to 580 ESUS cases, the classifier predicted that 44% (95% credibility interval, 39%-49%) resulted from cardiac embolism. Individual ESUS patients' predicted likelihood of cardiac embolism was associated with eventual atrial fibrillation detection (OR per 10% increase, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.03-1.57];
conclusionsA machine learning estimator that distinguished known cardioembolic versus noncardioembolic strokes indirectly estimated that 44% of ESUS cases were cardioembolic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.