ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020
Assessment of surface roughness and blood rheology on local coronary haemodynamics: a multi-scale computational fluid dynamics study.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulating the Transmural Mechanical Response of Functionally Graded Arterial Grafts.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Correlation analysis of hematocrit level and coronary heart disease in patients with chest pain: a case-control study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Advances in the Computational Assessment of Disturbed Coronary Flow and Wall Shear Stress: A Contemporary Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Fluid-structure interaction simulation of visceral perfusion and impact of different cannulation methods on aortic dissection.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Combined electromechanically driven pulsating flow of nonlinear viscoelastic fluids in narrow confinements.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Accuracy of vascular tortuosity measures using computational modelling.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Computational fluid dynamics of the right atrium: Assessment of modelling criteria for the evaluation of dialysis catheters.PloS one · 2021Article
- Numerical modelling of blood rheology and platelet activation through a stenosed left coronary artery bifurcation.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surface roughness of the coronary artery is associated with the onset of atherosclerosis. The study applies, for the first time, the micro-scale variation of the artery surface to a 3D coronary model, investigating the impact on haemodynamic parameters which are indicators for atherosclerosis. The surface roughness of porcine coronary arteries have been detailed based on optical microscopy and implemented into a cylindrical section of coronary artery. Several approaches to rheology are compared to determine the benefits/limitations of both single and multiphase models for multi-scale geometry. Haemodynamic parameters averaged over the rough/smooth sections are similar; however, the rough surface experiences a much wider range, with maximum wall shear stress greater than 6 Pa compared to the approximately 3 Pa on the smooth segment. This suggests the smooth-walled assumption may neglect important near-wall haemodynamics. While rheological models lack sufficient definition to truly encompass the micro-scale effects occurring over the rough surface, single-phase models (Newtonian and non-Newtonian) provide numerically stable and comparable results to other coronary simulations. Multiphase models allow for phase interactions between plasma and red blood cells which is more suited to such multi-scale models. These models require additional physical laws to govern advection/aggregation of particulates in the near-wall region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.