Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781934›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020

Swimming and defence: competing needs across ontogeny in armoured fishes (Agonidae).

M A Kolmann, T Peixoto, J A Pfeiffenberger, A P Summers, C M Donatelli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Testing the Limits: Functional Strengths and Weaknesses of Poacher (Agonidae) Armor.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Embryonic Development and Growth Performance of the Tomato Hind Grouper (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M A KolmannFriday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington College of the Environment, Friday Harbor, WA, USA.
T PeixotoFriday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington College of the Environment, Friday Harbor, WA, USA.
J A PfeiffenbergerDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
A P SummersFriday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington College of the Environment, Friday Harbor, WA, USA.
C M DonatelliDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Tufts University · USGeorge Washington University · USNortheastern University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological armours are potent model systems for understanding the complex series of competing demands on protective exoskeletons; after all, armoured organisms are the product of millions of years of refined engineering under the harshest conditions. Fishes are no strangers to armour, with various types of armour plating common to the 400-500 Myr of evolution in both jawed and jawless fishes. Here, we focus on the poachers (Agonidae), a family of armoured fishes native to temperate waters of the Pacific rim. We examined armour morphology, body stiffness and swimming performance in the northern spearnose poacher (

Indexed as

PerciformesSwimmingAnimalsFishesLocomotionModels, BiologicalCottoideamultifunctionalsquamationstiffnesstessellation

Identifiers

PMID32781934
PMCPMC7482565
OpenAlexW3048965538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.