Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781668›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2020

Spoilage of Chilled Fresh Meat Products during Storage: A Quantitative Analysis of Literature Data.

Ngoc-Du Martin Luong, Louis Coroller, Monique Zagorec, Jeanne-Marie Membré, Sandrine Guillou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ngoc-Du Martin LuongSECALIM, INRAE, ONIRIS, Université Bretagne Loire, Route de Gachet, CS 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.
Louis CorollerUniversité de Brest, Laboratoire Universitaire de Biodiversité et Ecologie Microbienne, UMT Alter'ix, F-29334 Quimper, France.
Monique ZagorecSECALIM, INRAE, ONIRIS, Université Bretagne Loire, Route de Gachet, CS 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.
Jeanne-Marie MembréSECALIM, INRAE, ONIRIS, Université Bretagne Loire, Route de Gachet, CS 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6751-4426
Sandrine GuillouSECALIM, INRAE, ONIRIS, Université Bretagne Loire, Route de Gachet, CS 40706, F-44307 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0607-9229
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE21-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A literature search was performed on spoilage of fresh meat products by combining keyword query, text mining and expert elicitation. From the 258 collected studies, a quantitative analysis was first performed to identify the methods which are the most used to evaluate spoilage beside the preservation strategies suggested. In a second step focusing on a subset of 24 publications providing quantitative data on spoilage occurrence time, associations between spoilage occurrence time of meat products and specific spoilage indicators were investigated. The analysis especially focused on factors well represented in the 24 publications, i.e., gas packaging (O

Indexed as

data analysisexpert knowledgemicrobiological spoilagemodified atmosphere packagingstorage temperaturetext-mining

Identifiers

PMID32781668
PMCPMC7465036
OpenAlexW3048271233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.