Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781619›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Biomarkers of Physical Frailty and Sarcopenia: Coming up to the Place?

Anna Picca, Riccardo Calvani, Matteo Cesari, Francesco Landi, Roberto Bernabei, Hélio José Coelho-Júnior, Emanuele Marzetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna PiccaFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7032-3487
Riccardo CalvaniFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5472-2365
Matteo CesariDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Francesco LandiFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Roberto BernabeiFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Hélio José Coelho-JúniorDepartment of Geriatric and Orthopedic Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7482-9514
Emanuele MarzettiFondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9567-6983

Funding

Centro Studi Achille e Linda Lorenzon N/ACoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Innovative Medicines Initiative 115621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical frailty and sarcopenia (PF&S) recapitulates all the hallmarks of aging and has become a focus in geroscience. Factors spanning muscle-specific processes (e.g., mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal myocytes) to systemic changes (e.g., inflammation and amino acid dysmetabolism) have been pinpointed as possible contributors to PF&S pathophysiology. However, the search for PF&S biomarkers allowing the early identification and tracking of the condition over time is ongoing. This is mainly due to the phenotypic heterogeneity of PF&S, its unclear pathophysiology, and the frequent superimposition of other age-related conditions. Hence, presently, the identification of PF&S relies upon clinical, functional, and imaging parameters. The adoption of multi-marker approaches (combined with multivariate modeling) has shown great potential for addressing the complexity of PF&S pathophysiology and identifying candidate biological markers. Well-designed longitudinal studies are necessary for the incorporation of reliable biomarkers into clinical practice and for unveiling novel targets that are amenable to interventions.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFrailtyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInflammationSarcopeniaBiomarkerscytokinesexosomesextracellular vesiclesgerosciencegut dysbiosisinflammationmetabolomicsmitochondrial dysfunctionphysical performanceskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID32781619
PMCPMC7460617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.