Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781588›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Fabrication and Biological Analysis of Highly Porous PEEK Bionanocomposites Incorporated with Carbon and Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles for Biological Applications.

P D Swaminathan, Md Nizam Uddin, P Wooley, Ramazan Asmatulu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Research progress on enhancing osseointegration properties of polyetheretherketone implants through various modification methods].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Fabrication ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bioinspired Modifications of PEEK Implants for Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P D SwaminathanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260, USA.
Md Nizam UddinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2192-2592
P WooleyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260, USA.
Ramazan AsmatuluDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260, USA.
Wichita State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone regeneration for replacing and repairing damaged and defective bones in the human body has attracted much attention over the last decade. In this research, highly porous polyetheretherketone (PEEK)/hydroxyapatite (HA) bionanocomposite scaffolds reinforced with carbon fiber (CF) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were fabricated, and their structural, mechanical, and biological properties were studied in detail. Salt porogen (200-500 µm size) leaching methods were adapted to produce porous PEEK structures with controlled pore size and distribution, facilitating greater cellular infiltration and biological integration of PEEK composites within patient tissue. In biological tests, nanocomposites proved to be non-toxic and have very good cell viability. In addition, bone marrow cell growth was observed, and PEEK/HA biocomposites with carbon particles showed increased cell attachment over the neat PEEK/HA composites. In cell viability tests, bionanocomposites with 0.5 wt% CNTs established good attachment of cells on disks compared to neat PEEK/HA biocomposites. A similar performance was seen in culture tests of bone marrow cells (osteoblasts and osteoclasts). The 0.5 wt% CF for osteoblasts and 1 wt% CNTs for osteoclasts showed higher cell attachment. The addition of carbon-based nanomaterials into PEEK/HA has been identified as an effective approach to improve cell attachment as well as mechanical and biological properties. With confirmed cell attachment and sustained viability and proliferation of the fabricated PEEK/HA/CNTs, CF bionanocomposites were confirmed to possess excellent biocompatibility and will have potential uses in bone scaffolding and other biomedical applications.

Indexed as

BenzophenonesCell AdhesionCell SurvivalDurapatiteKetonesMechanical PhenomenaNanocompositesNanoparticlesNanotubes, CarbonOsteoclastsPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersPorosityBenzophenonesDurapatiteKetonesNanotubes, CarbonpolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersbionanocompositesbone marrow cellcarbon particlescell viabilitycytotoxicityhydroxyapatitePEEK

Identifiers

PMID32781588
PMCPMC7466140
OpenAlexW3047492008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.