Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781529›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.

Rui Fu, Yunxing Chen, Qingjin Xu, Yuxi Guo, Wei Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Texting While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  3. Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  4. Distracted Behavior of Pedestrians While Crossing Street: A Case Study in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rui FuSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.
Yunxing ChenSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4985-1669
Qingjin XuSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4474-4533
Yuxi GuoSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.
Wei YuanSchool of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.
Chang'an University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of mobile phones while driving is a very common phenomenon that has become one of the main causes of traffic accidents. Many studies on the effects of mobile phone use on accident risk have focused on conversation and texting; however, few studies have directly compared the impacts of speech-based texting and handheld texting on accident risk, especially during sudden braking events. This study aims to statistically model and quantify the effects of potential factors on accident risk associated with a sudden braking event in terms of the driving behavior characteristics of young drivers, the behavior of the lead vehicle (LV), and mobile phone distraction tasks (i.e., both speech-based and handheld texting). For this purpose, a total of fifty-five licensed young drivers completed a driving simulator experiment in a Chinese urban road environment under five driving conditions: baseline (no phone use), simple speech-based texting, complex speech-based texting, simple handheld texting, and complex handheld texting. Generalized linear mixed models were developed for the brake reaction time and rear-end accident probability during the sudden braking events. The results showed that handheld texting tasks led to a delayed response to the sudden braking events as compared to the baseline. However, speech-based texting tasks did not slow down the response. Moreover, drivers responded faster when the initial time headway was shorter, when the initial speed was higher, or when the LV deceleration rate was greater. The rear-end accident probability respectively increased by 2.41 and 2.77 times in the presence of simple and complex handheld texting while driving. Surprisingly, the effects of speech-based texting tasks were not significant, but the accident risk increased if drivers drove the vehicle with a shorter initial time headway or a higher LV deceleration rate. In summary, these findings suggest that the effects of mobile phone distraction tasks, driving behavior characteristics, and the behavior of the LV should be taken into consideration when developing algorithms for forward collision warning systems.

Indexed as

Text MessagingAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAttentionAutomobile DrivingCell PhoneCell Phone UseChinaCitiesComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleSpeechUrban PopulationYoung Adultbrake reaction timedriving behavior characteristicshandheld textinglead vehicle deceleration raterear-end accident probabilityspeech-based texting

Identifiers

PMID32781529
PMCPMC7459486
OpenAlexW3047295481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.