Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781247›Full record

ArticlePractical radiation oncology

Low-Dose Hypofractionated Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy for Adult Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma.

Elizabeth B Jeans, Yue-Houng Hu, Bradley J Stish, Brian King, Mark Davis, William S Harmsen, Kristin M Fruth, Sarah E Locher, Christopher L Deufel, Jaden D Evans and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiation therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies: A COVID-era ILROG collaborative report.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Total Skin Treatment with Helical Arc Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth B JeansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Yue-Houng HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Bradley J StishDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Brian KingDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mark DavisDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
William S HarmsenDepartment of Biomedical Statics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kristin M FruthDepartment of Biomedical Statics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sarah E LocherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Christopher L DeufelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jaden D EvansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, Intermountain Healthcare, Ogden, Utah.
James A MartensonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Scott C LesterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: lester.scott@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHistorically, the standard of care for total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) delivered 30 to 36 Gy over 5 to 10 weeks. Given the high risk of relapse, a majority of patients require additional treatments. Therefore, attempts to use a shortened course of TSEBT have been investigated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective review to evaluate disease response, control, and toxicity using a low-dose, hypofractionated course of TSEBT (HTSEBT) in patients with mycosis fungoides.

resultsForty patients received 57 courses of HTSEBT. Median dose (Gy)/fractionation was 12/3, spanning a median time of 2.4 weeks. Overall response rate of patients assessed (n = 54) was 100%. Thirty-one courses (57.4%) resulted in a complete response and 23 courses (42.6%) resulted in a partial response. Cumulative incidence of progressive skin disease at 3 months was 37.2%, at 6 months, 56.9%, and at 1 year, 81.5%. Of the 40 patients treated with a first course of HTSEBT, 31 received subsequent courses of radiotherapy. Cumulative incidence of subsequent treatment was 28.0% at 3 months, 46.8% at 6 months, and 70.0% at 1 year. Patients who underwent repeat courses of HTSEBT continued to have similar treatment responses to repeat courses without increased toxicities. Toxicities from all courses were acceptable with the exception of 1 patient, who experienced grade 4 skin toxicity (moist desquamation requiring hospitalization).

conclusionsLow-dose HTSEBT provides good palliation in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with a satisfactory response and toxicity profile. HTSEBT allows therapy to be completed in far fewer treatments. Low-dose HTSEBT is an appropriate treatment option for patients unable to come for daily treatment. HTSEBT provides a way to decrease exposure to other patients and staff during public health emergencies such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLymphoma, T-Cell, CutaneousMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesSkinTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID32781247
PMCPMC7414776
OpenAlexW3048344613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.