Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781246›Full record

ReviewPractical radiation oncology

Practical Safety Considerations for Integration of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy.

Qiongge Hu, Victoria Y Yu, Yingli Yang, Peng Hu, Ke Sheng, Percy P Lee, Amar U Kishan, Ann C Raldow, Dylan P O'Connell, Kaley E Woods and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Practical radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Qiongge HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Victoria Y YuDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Yingli YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Peng HuDepartment of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Ke ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Percy P LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Amar U KishanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Ann C RaldowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Dylan P O'ConnellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Kaley E WoodsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Minsong CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: minsongcao@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in integrating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) practice has increased dramatically in recent years owing to its unique advantages such as excellent soft tissue contrast and capability of measuring biological properties. Continuous real-time imaging for intrafractional motion tracking without ionizing radiation serves as a particularly attractive feature for applications in RT. Despite its many advantages, the integration of MRI in RT workflows is not straightforward, with many unmet needs. MR safety remains one of the key challenges and concerns in the clinical implementation of MR simulators and MR-guided radiation therapy systems in radiation oncology. Most RT staff are not accustomed to working in an environment with a strong magnetic field. There are specific requirements in RT that are different from diagnostic applications. A large variety of implants and devices used in routine RT practice do not have clear MR safety labels. RT-specific imaging pulse sequences focusing on fast acquisition, high spatial integrity, and continuous, real-time acquisition require additional MR safety testing and evaluation. This article provides an overview of MR safety tailored toward RT staff, followed by discussions on specific requirements and challenges associated with MR safety in the RT environment. Strategies and techniques for developing an MR safety program specific to RT are presented and discussed.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansRadiation Oncology

Identifiers

PMID32781246
PMCPMC8472473
OpenAlexW3047734820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.