ArticleAnaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine2020
Haemodynamic monitoring and management in COVID-19 intensive care patients: an International survey.
Article in Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI for the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill and surgical patients: focus on clinical applications.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes among critically ill patients with cancer and COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Observational
- Transthoracic echocardiography of patients in prone position ventilation during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational and retrospective study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Observational
- Comparison of Respiratory and Hemodynamic Parameters of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
- Critically ill patients with COVID-19: are they hemodynamically unstable and do we know why?Intensive care medicine · 2021Article
- Cardio-Pulmonary-Renal Consequences of Severe COVID-19.Cardiorenal medicine · 2021Review
- Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for COVID-19 (PoCUS4COVID): international expert consensus.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Review
- Haemodynamic monitoring of COVID-19 patients: Classical methods and new paradigms.Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine · 2020Article
- COVID-19 and haemodynamic failure: a point of view on mechanisms and treatment.Anaesthesiology intensive therapyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo survey haemodynamic monitoring and management practices in intensive care patients with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
methodsA questionnaire was shared on social networks or via email by the authors and by Anaesthesia and/or Critical Care societies from France, Switzerland, Belgium, Brazil, and Portugal. Intensivists and anaesthetists involved in COVID-19 ICU care were invited to answer 14 questions about haemodynamic monitoring and management.
resultsGlobally, 1000 questionnaires were available for analysis. Responses came mainly from Europe (n = 460) and America (n = 434). According to a majority of respondents, COVID-19 ICU patients frequently or very frequently received continuous vasopressor support (56%) and had an echocardiography performed (54%). Echocardiography revealed a normal cardiac function, a hyperdynamic state (43%), hypovolaemia (22%), a left ventricular dysfunction (21%) and a right ventricular dilation (20%). Fluid responsiveness was frequently assessed (84%), mainly using echo (62%), and cardiac output was measured in 69%, mostly with echo as well (53%). Venous oxygen saturation was frequently measured (79%), mostly from a CVC blood sample (94%). Tissue perfusion was assessed biologically (93%) and clinically (63%). Pulmonary oedema was detected and quantified mainly using echo (67%) and chest X-ray (61%).
conclusionOur survey confirms that vasopressor support is not uncommon in COVID-19 ICU patients and suggests that different haemodynamic phenotypes may be observed. Ultrasounds were used by many respondents, to assess cardiac function but also to predict fluid responsiveness and quantify pulmonary oedema. Although we observed regional differences, current international guidelines were followed by most respondents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.