Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32781008›Full record

ArticleJournal of virological methods2020

Comparison analysis of different swabs and transport mediums suitable for SARS-CoV-2 testing following shortages.

Lauren Garnett, Alexander Bello, Kaylie N Tran, Jonathan Audet, Anders Leung, Zachary Schiffman, Bryan D Griffin, Nikesh Tailor, Darwyn Kobasa, James E Strong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virological methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Performance of saline and water gargling for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection kits: a comparative study.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ACS omega · 2022
    Article
  17. Performance of anterior nares and tongue swabs for nucleic acid, Nucleocapsid, and Spike antigen testing for detecting SARS-CoV-2 against nasopharyngeal PCR and viral culture.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Influence of preanalytical parameters on influenza and respiratory syncytial virus molecular detection.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2022
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lauren GarnettSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Alexander BelloSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada.
Kaylie N TranSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada.
Jonathan AudetSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada.
Anders LeungSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada.
Zachary SchiffmanSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Bryan D GriffinSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada.
Nikesh TailorSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada.
Darwyn KobasaSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
James E StrongSpecial Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Electronic address: jim.strong@canada.ca.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) assessed COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, as a pandemic. As of June 1, 2020, SARS-CoV-2 has had a documented effect of over 6 million cases world-wide, amounting to over 370,000 deaths (World Health Organization, 2020. Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Situation. http://https://covid19.who.int/). Consequently, the high demand for testing has resulted in a depletion of commercially available consumables, including the recommended swabs and viral transport media (VTM) required for nasopharyngeal sampling. Therefore, the potential use of unvalidated alternatives must be explored to address the global shortage of testing supplies. To tackle this issue, we evaluated the utility of different swabs and transport mediums for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2. This study compared the performance of six swabs commonly found in primary and tertiary health care settings (PurFlock Ultra, FLOQSwab, Puritan Pur-Wraps cotton tipped applicators, Puritan polyester tipped applicators, MedPro 6" cotton tipped applicators, and HOLOGIC Aptima) for their efficacy in testing for SARS-CoV-2. Separately, the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 was completed from different transport mediums (DMEM, PBS, 100 % ethanol, 0.9 % normal saline and VTM), which were kept up to three days at room temperature (RT). The results indicate that there is no meaningful difference in viral yield from different swabs and most transport mediums for the collection and detection of SARS-CoV-2, indicating swab and medium alternatives could be used if supplies run out.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Specimen HandlingDiagnostic testingSARS-CoV-2Swab

Identifiers

PMID32781008
PMCPMC7414358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.