Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780831›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2020

Respiratory Effects of Exposure to Aerosol From the Candidate Modified-Risk Tobacco Product THS 2.2 in an 18-Month Systems Toxicology Study With A/J Mice.

Bjoern Titz, Alain Sewer, Karsta Luettich, Ee Tsin Wong, Emmanuel Guedj, Catherine Nury, Thomas Schneider, Yang Xiang, Keyur Trivedi, Grégory Vuillaume and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bjoern TitzPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Alain SewerPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Karsta LuettichPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Ee Tsin WongPhilip Morris International Research Laboratories Pte. Ltd, Singapore 117406.
Emmanuel GuedjPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Catherine NuryPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Thomas SchneiderBiognosys AG, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.
Yang XiangPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Keyur TrivediPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Grégory VuillaumePMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Patrice LeroyPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Ansgar BüttnerHistovia GmbH, 51491 Overath, Germany.
Florian MartinPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Nikolai V IvanovPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Patrick VanscheeuwijckPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Julia HoengPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Manuel C PeitschPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Philip Morris International (Switzerland) · CHBiognosys (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoking cessation is the most effective measure for reducing the risk of smoking-related diseases. However, switching to less harmful products (modified-risk tobacco products [MRTP]) can be an alternative to help reduce the risk for adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke. In an 18-month chronic carcinogenicity/toxicity study in A/J mice (OECD Test Guideline 453), we assessed the aerosol of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS 2.2), a candidate MRTP based on the heat-not-burn principle, compared with 3R4F cigarette smoke (CS). To capture toxicity- and disease-relevant mechanisms, we complemented standard toxicology endpoints with in-depth systems toxicology analyses. In this part of our publication series, we report on integrative assessment of the apical and molecular exposure effects on the respiratory tract (nose, larynx, and lungs). Across the respiratory tract, we found changes in inflammatory response following 3R4F CS exposure (eg, antimicrobial peptide response in the nose), with both shared and distinct oxidative and xenobiotic responses. Compared with 3R4F CS, THS 2.2 aerosol exerted far fewer effects on respiratory tract histology, including adaptive tissue changes in nasal and laryngeal epithelium and inflammation and emphysematous changes in the lungs. Integrative analysis of molecular changes confirmed the substantially lower impact of THS 2.2 aerosol than 3R4F CS on toxicologically and disease-relevant molecular processes such as inflammation, oxidative stress responses, and xenobiotic metabolism. In summary, this work exemplifies how apical and molecular endpoints can be combined effectively for toxicology assessment and further supports findings on the reduced respiratory health risks of THS 2.2 aerosol.

Indexed as

Inhalation ExposureTobacco ProductsAerosolsAnimalsEndpoint DeterminationInflammationLarynxLungMiceNoseRespiratory MucosaSmokeToxicity Tests, ChronicAerosolsSmokecigarette smokegene expressionheated tobacco producthistologymouseprotein expressionrespiratory

Identifiers

PMID32780831
PMCPMC7657339
OpenAlexW3048471443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.