ArticlePloS one2020
Use of deep learning methods to translate drug-induced gene expression changes from rat to human primary hepatocytes.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: from algorithmic foundations to clinical translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Application of transfer learning to predict drug-induced human in vivo gene expression changes using rat in vitro and in vivo data.PloS one · 2023Article
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Toxicological Sciences.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical trials, animal and cell line models are often used to evaluate the potential toxic effects of a novel compound or candidate drug before progressing to human trials. However, relating the results of animal and in vitro model exposures to relevant clinical outcomes in the human in vivo system still proves challenging, relying on often putative orthologs. In recent years, multiple studies have demonstrated that the repeated dose rodent bioassay, the current gold standard in the field, lacks sufficient sensitivity and specificity in predicting toxic effects of pharmaceuticals in humans. In this study, we evaluate the potential of deep learning techniques to translate the pattern of gene expression measured following an exposure in rodents to humans, circumventing the current reliance on orthologs, and also from in vitro to in vivo experimental designs. Of the applied deep learning architectures applied in this study the convolutional neural network (CNN) and a deep artificial neural network with bottleneck architecture significantly outperform classical machine learning techniques in predicting the time series of gene expression in primary human hepatocytes given a measured time series of gene expression from primary rat hepatocytes following exposure in vitro to a previously unseen compound across multiple toxicologically relevant gene sets. With a reduction in average mean absolute error across 76 genes that have been shown to be predictive for identifying carcinogenicity from 0.0172 for a random regression forest to 0.0166 for the CNN model (p < 0.05). These deep learning architecture also perform well when applied to predict time series of in vivo gene expression given measured time series of in vitro gene expression for rats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.