ArticleIEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence2022
Model-Protected Multi-Task Learning.
Article in IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foundation models in healthcare: a comprehensive review from technical advances to clinical translation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Current development and prospects of deep learning in spine image analysis: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-task learning (MTL) refers to the paradigm of learning multiple related tasks together. In contrast, in single-task learning (STL) each individual task is learned independently. MTL often leads to better trained models because they can leverage the commonalities among related tasks. However, because MTL algorithms can "leak" information from different models across different tasks, MTL poses a potential security risk. Specifically, an adversary may participate in the MTL process through one task and thereby acquire the model information for another task. The previously proposed privacy-preserving MTL methods protect data instances rather than models, and some of them may underperform in comparison with STL methods. In this paper, we propose a privacy-preserving MTL framework to prevent information from each model leaking to other models based on a perturbation of the covariance matrix of the model matrix. We study two popular MTL approaches for instantiation, namely, learning the low-rank and group-sparse patterns of the model matrix. Our algorithms can be guaranteed not to underperform compared with STL methods. We build our methods based upon tools for differential privacy, and privacy guarantees, utility bounds are provided, and heterogeneous privacy budgets are considered. The experiments demonstrate that our algorithms outperform the baseline methods constructed by existing privacy-preserving MTL methods on the proposed model-protection problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.