ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2020
Reduction of pericardial effusion in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with KRAS, TP53, and MET mutation treated with nivolumab.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognosis and role of clinical and imaging features in patients with malignant pericardial effusion: a single-center study in China.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that is used to treat various advanced cancers, including metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nivolumab treatment has different side effects. For this patient with advanced NSCLC, pericardial effusion was considered to be an immune-related adverse event after immunotherapy. It was characterized by deterioration of symptoms and considered to be pseudo-progression. The pericardial effusion gradually disappeared as nivolumab treatment continued during intensive follow-up monitoring. After chemotherapy and disease progression, the patient was treated with oral targeted therapy based on genes that were detected. After the re-imaging to assess the targeted therapy progress, immunotherapy was used. During immunotherapy, the patient showed increased pericardial effusion, and he underwent one pericardial puncture, in which 200 mL of pericardial effusion was drained. The pericardial effusion after puncture was not diagnosed as malignant by pathology, and the pericardial effusion remained. Shortness of breath continually improved during immunotherapy, and immunotherapy was continued with close observation. After 11 cycles, pericardial effusion had resolved. This case suggested that NSCLC pericardial effusion that was caused by an immune-related adverse event after immunotherapy might be considered to be pseudo-progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.