Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780459›Full record

ArticleArtificial organs2021

Intra-aortic balloon pump: Looking at the other side.

Sandro Gelsomino, Monique M J de Jong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial organs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandro GelsominoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular Research Institute CARIM Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-989X
Monique M J de JongDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular Research Institute CARIM Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-aortic balloon pump has been the most commonly employed cardiac assist device in the past, although, in recent years, its use in cardiogenic shock has been questioned. The pathophysiology of the proximal part of the balloon has been well studied, whereas, hemodynamics and flow below the distal portion of the balloon have not been fully understood yet. The distal flow contains a three-wave flow pattern during diastolic balloon expansion: a flow reduction in early diastole, a backflow in mid-diastole followed by a tele-diastolic flow. More research on this topic is warranted to better understand the physics of the distal part of the balloon and its interaction with the three components of the local regulatory system: intrinsic (local metabolic and myogenic), extrinsic (autonomic nervous system), and humoral (local or circulating vasoactive substances). These new insights will be a guide for new balloon designs that will allow enhanced performance and improved outcomes.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous SystemDiastoleEquipment DesignHeart-Assist DevicesHemodynamicsHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingIschemiaRegional Blood FlowShock, CardiogenicVisceraabdominal flowcirculationintra-aortic balloon

Identifiers

PMID32780459
PMCPMC7984086
OpenAlexW3048869183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.