ReviewNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2020
Cardiogenetics, 25 years a growing subspecialism.
Review in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of genetic testing for heritable cardiac conditions: A scoping review.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Review
- Super-Enhancers and Their Parts: From Prediction Efforts to Pathognomonic Status.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- New Genetically Determined Markers of the Functional State of the Cardiovascular System.Genes · 2023Article
- Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells as "disease-in-a-dish" models for inherited cardiomyopathies and channelopathies - 15 years of research.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
- Results of comprehensive genetic testing in patients presenting to a multidisciplinary inherited heart disease clinic in India.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cardiology and clinical genetics subspecialty of cardiogenetics has experienced a tremendous growth in the past 25 years. This review discusses examples of the progress that has been made as well as new challenges that have arisen within this field, with special focus on the Netherlands. A significant number of Dutch founder mutations, i.e. mutations shared by a number of individuals who have a common origin and all share a unique chromosomal background on which the mutation occurred, have been identified and have provided unique insights into genotype-phenotype correlations in inherited arrhythmia syndromes and inherited cardiomyopathies.Cardiological and genetic screening of family members of young victims of sudden cardiac death combined with genetic testing in the deceased individual have turned out to be rewarding. However, the interpretation of the results of genetic testing in this setting and in the setting of living patients with a (suspected) phenotype is now considered more challenging than previously anticipated, because the introduction of high-throughput sequencing technologies has resulted in the identification of a significant number of variants of unknown significance. Interpretation of genetic and clinical findings by experienced multidisciplinary teams are key to ensure a high quality of care to the patient and the family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.