Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780320›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Fibromatosis of the breast: a 10-year multi-institutional experience and review of the literature.

Michael R Boland, Timothy Nugent, Jack Nolan, Johnny O'Mahony, Sylvia O'Keeffe, Charles C Gillham, Aoife Maguire, James Geraghty, Damian McCartan, Denis Evoy and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pitfalls in breast pathology.Histopathology · 2023
    Review
  12. Spindle cell lesions of the breast: a diagnostic approach.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael R BolandDepartments of Breast Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland. michaelboland@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-8189
Timothy NugentDepartments of Breast Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.
Jack NolanDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincents Hospital, Dublin, 4, Ireland.
Johnny O'MahonyDepartments of Radiology, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.
Sylvia O'KeeffeDepartments of Radiology, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.
Charles C GillhamDepartments of Radiation Oncology, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.
Aoife MaguireDepartments of Pathology, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.
James GeraghtyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincents Hospital, Dublin, 4, Ireland.
Damian McCartanDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincents Hospital, Dublin, 4, Ireland.
Denis EvoyDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincents Hospital, Dublin, 4, Ireland.
Ruth S PrichardDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincents Hospital, Dublin, 4, Ireland.
Enda W McDermottDepartment of Breast Surgery, St Vincents Hospital, Dublin, 4, Ireland.
Dhaffir AlazawiDepartments of Breast Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.
Terence J BoyleDepartments of Breast Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.
Elizabeth M ConnollyDepartments of Breast Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin, 8, Ireland.
St. James's Hospital · IESt. Vincent's University Hospital · IESt Michael’s Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast fibromatosis is a rare clinical entity, but poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In light of recent changes in management practices, the aim was to review our institutional experience of breast fibromatosis and provide a review of current available literature on such management.

methodsA search of pathological databases within two tertiary institutions for all patients diagnosed with fibromatosis of the breast over a 10-year period (2007-2016) was performed. Clinicopathological characteristics and modes of treatment were recorded for each patient. Concurrently a comprehensive literature search was performed and studies relating to breast fibromatosis and its management were identified and reviewed.

resultsSixteen patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 42 (range 21-70) and all patients were diagnosed with core biopsy. The most useful imaging modality in diagnosis was ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. 13/16 were treated surgically whilst 3/16 were treated using a watch-and-wait approach. 6/13 (46%) required re-excision of margins and 2/13 (15%) had recurrence after surgery. On review of the literature, there is no dedicated guideline in place for the management of breast fibromatosis. Currently a 'watch and wait' approach is favoured over surgical intervention due to high levels of recurrence and associated surgical morbidity. All cases should be discussed at a sarcoma multidisciplinary team meeting and tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered in advanced cases.

conclusionsBreast fibromatosis is rare but affects young patients. Active surveillance is now favoured over surgical resection due to high recurrence rates and extensive morbidity. Dedicated guidelines are required to ensure best outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFibromaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsPractice Guidelines as TopicReoperationUltrasonography, MammaryBreastDesmoidFibromatosisSurgery

Identifiers

PMID32780320
OpenAlexW3048754321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.