Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780287›Full record

ArticleHandbook of experimental pharmacology2021

NOX Inhibitors: From Bench to Naxibs to Bedside.

Mahmoud H Elbatreek, Hermann Mucke, Harald H H W Schmidt

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Enhancing Selectivity and Potency of SJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Senotherapy for chronic lung disease.Pharmacological reviews · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. NOX Family: Regulators of Reactive Oxygen Species Balance in Tumor Cells.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Navigating the redox landscape: reactive oxygen species in regulation of cell cycle.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2024
    Review
  15. The treatment of primary biliary cholangitis: from shadow to light.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmoud H ElbatreekDepartment of Pharmacology and Personalised Medicine, School of MeHNS, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. melbatreek@ppmlab.net.
Hermann MuckeH. M. Pharma Consultancy, Vienna, Austria.
Harald H H W SchmidtDepartment of Pharmacology and Personalised Medicine, School of MeHNS, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are ubiquitous metabolic products and important cellular signaling molecules that contribute to several biological functions. Pathophysiology arises when ROS are generated either in excess or in cell types or subcellular locations that normally do not produce ROS or when non-physiological types of ROS (e.g., superoxide instead of hydrogen peroxide) are formed. In the latter scenario, antioxidants were considered as the apparent remedy but, clinically, have consistently failed and even sometimes induced harm. The obvious reason for that is the non-selective ROS scavenging effects of antioxidants which interfere with both qualities of ROS, physiological and pathological. Therefore, it is essential to overcome this "antidote or neutralizer" strategy. We here review the most promising alternative approach by identifying the disease-relevant enzymatic sources of ROS, target these selectively, but leave physiological ROS signaling through other sources intact. Among all ROS sources, NADPH oxidases (NOX1-5 and DUOX1-2) stand out as their sole function is to produce ROS, whereas most other enzymatic sources only produce ROS as a by-product or upon biochemical uncoupling or damage. This qualifies NOXs as the main potential drug-target candidates in diseases associated with dysfunction in ROS signaling. As a reflection of this, the development of several NOX inhibitors has taken place. Recently, the WHO approved a new stem, "naxib," which refers to NADPH oxidase inhibitors, and thereby recognized NOX inhibitors as a new therapeutic class. This has been announced while clinical trials with the first-in-class compound, setanaxib (initially known as GKT137831) had been initiated. We also review the differences between the seven NOX family members in terms of structure and function in health and disease and then focus on the most advanced NOX inhibitors with an exclusive focus on clinically relevant validations and applications. Therapeutically relevant NADPH oxidase isoforms type 1, 2, 4, and 5 (NOX1, NOX2, NOX4, NOX5). Of note, NOX5 is not present in mice and rats and thus pre-clinically less studied. NOX2, formerly termed gp91

Indexed as

NADPH OxidasesSignal TransductionAnimalsEnzyme InhibitorsMiceNADPH Oxidase 1RatsReactive Oxygen SpeciesEnzyme InhibitorsNADPH Oxidase 1NADPH OxidasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesMechanism-based redox therapeuticsNADPH oxidasesNOX inhibitorsReactive oxygen speciesSetanaxib

Identifiers

PMID32780287
OpenAlexW3048401117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.