ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020
Updates in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Exploration of the Etiology to Guide Therapy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Platelet-hitchhike nanomedicine for theranostics of coronary artery dissection via X-CT imaging and inhibiting NLRP3 signaling pathway.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- From Atherosclerosis to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Defining a Clinical and Genetic Risk Spectrum for Myocardial Infarction.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Acute myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a young male with systemic lupus erythematosus: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a Patient With Cardiogenic Shock: To Revascularize or Not to Revascularize?Cureus · 2024Article
- Peripartum Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.JACC. Case reports · 2023Article
- A review of the risk and precipitating factors for spontaneous coronary artery dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Discussion on the causes of thrombolysis failure in a patient with STEMI: a case report.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Sudden Cardiac Death Following Thrombolysis in a Young Woman with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2021Article
- The Self Sabotaging Vessel: A Case Report and Literature Review of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.Cureus · 2021Review
- Surgery is an option in evolving myocardial infarction induced by spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2021Article
- Pregnancy-Related Spontaneous Coronary Artery Pseudoaneurysm Healed by Medical Treatment Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis using emerging imaging modalities, management strategy, and prevention of recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) and provide a more extensive review of the current data. RECENT
findingsSCAD generally affects women without conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Diagnosis and management of SCAD are challenging due to heterogeneity, undefined mechanisms, differing phenotypes, and a lack of strong clinical evidence. After reviewing the current evidence to date, we recommend conservative management, including cardiac rehabilitation for SCAD with low-risk features, while coronary revascularization should be considered in SCAD with high-risk features. Non-invasive imaging (e.g., coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion imaging) should be considered in diagnosing specific SCAD phenotypes. The standard guideline-based medical therapy for acute coronary syndrome, in the absence of contraindications, should be considered along with appropriate SCAD phenotypes. Discharge counseling and follow-up using emerging imaging modalities should be based on individuals' profiles and approached on a case by case basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.