Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780242›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Facebook groups provide effective social support to patients after bariatric surgery.

Dimitrios I Athanasiadis, Alexandra Roper, William Hilgendorf, Adam Voss, Taylor Zike, Marisa Embry, Ambar Banerjee, Don Selzer, Dimitrios Stefanidis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Identifying Social Media-Based Interactions That Help Adults to Adhere to Weight Loss Goals: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Social media use among patients before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery: a systematic review.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. 'Journal of health psychology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. A twitter analysis of patient and family experience in pediatric spine surgery.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitrios I AthanasiadisDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr., EH 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Alexandra RoperIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
William HilgendorfIndiana University Health North Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Adam VossIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Taylor ZikeIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Marisa EmbryIndiana University Health North Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ambar BanerjeeDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr., EH 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Don SelzerDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr., EH 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Dimitrios StefanidisDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr., EH 130, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. dimstefa@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-0763
Indiana University Health · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial support after bariatric surgery is considered essential. Unfortunately, patient participation in such groups tends to be limited threatening their effectiveness. Facebook groups may provide a social support option that attracts more participation. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with the administration of a Facebook social support group and evaluate its perceived value by our bariatric patients.

methodsAfter IRB approval, all Facebook group posts since its establishment in 2015 were reviewed and a thematic analysis was undertaken. Group members also completed a survey related to their Facebook group experience and its perceived value. Responses were collected using 5-point Likert scales. In addition, 30 members were phone interviewed using open-ended questions and their responses were analyzed.

resultsOver 4 years, the group accumulated 12,507 posts, 104,053 comments, and 197,594 reactions. On average, members check the group page more than once per day. Ten common themes were identified in the submitted posts: questions, motivation related, education related, diet related, physical activity related, current status updates, sharing failures, social, random/humorous and other. Members reported that the group helped them do well with their procedure (3.3/5) particularly due to the motivation of others' successful stories (3.5/5) and made them feel understood (3.9/5) even though it offered limited help controlling their eating habits (2.7/5). The phone interviews suggested that the Facebook group offered constant support, was simple to use, and provided the sole social support for many patients. They most appreciated the motivational posts that kept them on track and the assistance/comments of clinical staff. In contrast, they disliked repeated questions/spam and negative stories shared by some members.

conclusionsFacebook groups can provide effective social support to patients after bariatric surgery. Peers educate, answer questions, and motivate patients by sharing their positive experiences. Whether this online connectedness also positively impacts patient outcomes requires further study.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgerySocial MediaHumansSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesBariatric surgeryFacebookSocial mediaSocial support

Identifiers

PMID32780242
OpenAlexW3048720544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.